Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Out of an estimated 5-10 million AR-15s, even more if we include mechanically equivalent rifles, in America, only 4 have been used in mass shootings. That's statistically a better safety record, by far, than all the Muslims the liberals don't want us to "blame of for the actions of a few."
Yet banning AR-15s is a great idea but ensuring proper vetting before admitting more refugees like Mir Seddique Mateen, Omar Marteen's father, into the country is not!
Could any liberals explain the logic behind this please?
Out of an estimated 5-10 million AR-15s, even more if we include mechanically equivalent rifles, in America, only 4 have been used in mass shootings. That's statistically a better safety record, by far, than all the Muslims the liberals don't want us to "blame of for the actions of a few."
Yet banning AR-15s is a great idea but ensuring proper vetting before admitting more refugees into the country is not!
Could any liberals explain the logic behind this please?
I've seen you around here before, and I know that you are aware that logic and the gun debate just don't work. The anti's refuse to listen to any form of fact and or logic on the matter.
Can't speak for anybody else, but there should be extensive background checks for all gun sales, as well as all potential immigrants. Neither should be banned, whether temporary or not.
Can't speak for anybody else, but there should be extensive background checks for all gun sales, as well as all potential immigrants. Neither should be banned, whether temporary or not.
So what is the difference between a background check and an extensive background check ?
Can't speak for anybody else, but there should be extensive background checks for all gun sales, as well as all potential immigrants. Neither should be banned, whether temporary or not.
What do we do with those rejected by the background check?
Out of an estimated 5-10 million AR-15s, even more if we include mechanically equivalent rifles, in America, only 4 have been used in mass shootings. That's statistically a better safety record, by far, than all the Muslims the liberals don't want us to "blame of for the actions of a few."
Yet banning AR-15s is a great idea but ensuring proper vetting before admitting more refugees like Mir Seddique Mateen, Omar Marteen's father, into the country is not!
Could any liberals explain the logic behind this please?
And how many Muslims have committed mass murder in America in the last 2 years? Three, just three.
How do we perform a "back ground check" on someone who lived in a hut with a dirt floor, no electricity or running water? The bgc for refugees is a farce.
How about we give AR-15s to the immigrants and send them back home to fight to get their country back?
No. Our president has armed enough Islamic terrorists as it is.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
