Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 01-25-2016, 07:33 AM
 
18,983 posts, read 9,094,953 times
Reputation: 14688

Advertisements

As the George W. Bush administration was launching its campaign to invade Iraq, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld had in his possession a classified report from the Joint Chiefs of Staff which undermined the administration's case for war. Rumsfeld buried the report.

'[Not sharing the report] raises questions about whether the administration withheld key information that could have undermined its case for war. Time and again, in the fall of 2002 and into early 2003, members of the administration spoke forcefully and without qualification about the threats they said Saddam Hussein posed. The JCS report undercut their assertions, and if it had been shared more widely within the administration, the debate would have been very different."

Iraq Invasion: Newly Discovered Document Reveals Unknowns About Iraq Weapons - POLITICO Magazine

After listening to all the teeth gnashing here about Clinton's emails--over which not a single American died or a single taxpayer dollar was squandered--will any Conservatives step up and demand an investigation into why a key report from the JCS, which undermined the case for war, was kept from the American public in the propaganda blitz leading up to the Iraq War?

 
Old 01-25-2016, 07:44 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,802,265 times
Reputation: 20675
When Saddam decided to trade oil in non petrodollars the decision was made to take him out. All that was needed was an excuse.

The invasion would not have been possible without Congress going along. Most voted along party lines.
 
Old 01-25-2016, 07:57 AM
 
18,983 posts, read 9,094,953 times
Reputation: 14688
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
When Saddam decided to trade oil in non petrodollars the decision was made to take him out. All that was needed was an excuse.

The invasion would not have been possible without Congress going along. Most voted along party lines.
Vital information was purposely withheld from Congress and from the American people. They voted based on intelligence that the Secretary of Defense knew was incomplete.
 
Old 01-25-2016, 08:28 AM
 
59,225 posts, read 27,416,604 times
Reputation: 14311
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAMS14 View Post
As the George W. Bush administration was launching its campaign to invade Iraq, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld had in his possession a classified report from the Joint Chiefs of Staff which undermined the administration's case for war. Rumsfeld buried the report.

'[Not sharing the report] raises questions about whether the administration withheld key information that could have undermined its case for war. Time and again, in the fall of 2002 and into early 2003, members of the administration spoke forcefully and without qualification about the threats they said Saddam Hussein posed. The JCS report undercut their assertions, and if it had been shared more widely within the administration, the debate would have been very different."

Iraq Invasion: Newly Discovered Document Reveals Unknowns About Iraq Weapons - POLITICO Magazine

After listening to all the teeth gnashing here about Clinton's emails--over which not a single American died or a single taxpayer dollar was squandered--will any Conservatives step up and demand an investigation into why a key report from the JCS, which undermined the case for war, was kept from the American public in the propaganda blitz leading up to the Iraq War?
Politico magazine? Really!
 
Old 01-25-2016, 08:32 AM
 
59,225 posts, read 27,416,604 times
Reputation: 14311
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
When Saddam decided to trade oil in non petrodollars the decision was made to take him out. All that was needed was an excuse.

The invasion would not have been possible without Congress going along. Most voted along party lines.
" Most voted along party lines."

ALL of the top dems voted for it.

The Senate Majority Leader co-sponsored the bill, and we know how the SML can KILL ANY bill he wants, AKA harry reid.

The House Minority Leaser co-sponsored the House version.

To say " Most voted along party lines." is a bot out of context.
 
Old 01-25-2016, 08:39 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,124 posts, read 44,928,596 times
Reputation: 13733
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
The invasion would not have been possible without Congress going along. Most voted along party lines.
The 1998 Iraq Liberation Act set the stage for the invasion to depose Saddam Hussein. Invading Iraq was an eventual done deal since 1998.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=457jp8VGhEE
 
Old 01-25-2016, 08:41 AM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,336,309 times
Reputation: 8958
No one is "happy" about having to do these investigations. If the Obama administration wasn't so corrupt, there wouldn't be need for so many investigations. But, we have an administration that refuses to uphold laws it doesn't agree with, change laws independently of Congress, make law, ignore law, ignore the Constitution and just do whatever they want, Congress be dmned.
 
Old 01-25-2016, 08:43 AM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,336,309 times
Reputation: 8958
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
" Most voted along party lines."

ALL of the top dems voted for it.

The Senate Majority Leader co-sponsored the bill, and we know how the SML can KILL ANY bill he wants, AKA harry reid.

The House Minority Leaser co-sponsored the House version.

To say " Most voted along party lines." is a bot out of context.
Indeed, including Hillary Clinton.

Tos say, "Most voted along party lines," is a bald faced lie.
 
Old 01-25-2016, 08:46 AM
 
12,270 posts, read 11,343,979 times
Reputation: 8066
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAMS14 View Post

After listening to all the teeth gnashing here about Clinton's emails--over which not a single American died or a single taxpayer dollar was squandered--will any Conservatives step up and demand an investigation into why a key report from the JCS, which undermined the case for war, was kept from the American public in the propaganda blitz leading up to the Iraq War?
Really? George W. Bush? Still losing sleep over GWB when we have an EO happy president trashing the constitution?
 
Old 01-25-2016, 08:50 AM
 
12,045 posts, read 6,587,017 times
Reputation: 13985
As an independent who currently leans pretty conservative, I have no problem with a continuing investigation of any corruption involved with the Iraq war and the Bush administration, but I don't see how Those travesties undermine or minimize the need to expose this administration's corruption and dishonesty.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top