Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I've noticed a scary trend. No matter what radical Muslims do, they get a pass. They can rape, murder, behead, take over parts of the west, blow up cities and buildings, terrorize, and cloak their women in black but they get a pass from leaders and liberals.
So, which is more frightening. Muslim terrorists, the leaders who are letting them in, or the liberals who defend them?
I say, the least scary are the Muslim terrorists because they are predictable. They want to kill Westerners and take over the world. They will move to more populated cities (usually liberal) live off welfare so they have time to make bombs and blow themselves up there. So anyone with a brain knows what to do when the idiots allow them to settle here. Stock up on guns and ammo and move to a rural town.
I think the leaders who are letting them in. I know a lot of people don't agree with me, but I really think the so called neo-isolationism is the best way to deal with radical Muslims.
No matter how much you are hated, as long as your enemies are not near you, how could they possibly harm you? Do people really believe "keep your enemies closer" non-sense when it comes to radical Muslims? (I did use the word Radical by the way. )
So I agree with you, the radical muslims are predictable, they want to kill us all. The ones who defend them are annoying, but besides trolling on the internet, I really can't see what else could they possibly do. It is the leaders who let them in are the most dangerous.
I've noticed a scary trend. No matter what radical Muslims do, they get a pass. They can rape, murder, behead, take over parts of the west, blow up cities and buildings, terrorize, and cloak their women in black but they get a pass from leaders and liberals.
So, which is more frightening. Muslim terrorists, the leaders who are letting them in, or the liberals who defend them?
I say, the least scary are the Muslim terrorists because they are predictable. They want to kill Westerners and take over the world. They will move to more populated cities (usually liberal) live off welfare so they have time to make bombs and blow themselves up there. So anyone with a brain knows what to do when the idiots allow them to settle here. Stock up on guns and ammo and move to a rural town.
I picked E. "Other", on account of nuclear war being more frightening than all the above.
Although I'm not going to lie, there's a lot of things that crossed my mind. One of those tropical parasites that swims up your ... junk.. and attaches itself with barbs inside of you. That one is frightening.
I've noticed a scary trend. No matter what radical Muslims do, they get a pass. They can rape, murder, behead, take over parts of the west, blow up cities and buildings, terrorize, and cloak their women in black but they get a pass from leaders and liberals.
Yes, because we will never see an allegedly conservative person cuddling up to the worst kind of Wahhabis...
Pulling up a picture of a past poor president is no diversion when compared to a much worse one.
The pres bowing to h king:
I never said I liked Obozzo either. It is possible to hate them both, you know.
But when Bush sucked up to the Saudis, the worthless pricks who fund Wahhabism around the world and fund Al-Quaeda, and even go out of his way to make sure their royal family got the royal-treatment in America right after 9/11, most conservatives were silent.
I never said I liked Obozzo either. It is possible to hate them both, you know.
But when Bush sucked up to the Saudis, the worthless pricks who fund Wahhabism around the world and fund Al-Quaeda, and even go out of his way to make sure their royal family got the royal-treatment in America right after 9/11, most conservatives were silent.
I've noticed a scary trend. No matter what radical Muslims do, they get a pass. They can rape, murder, behead, take over parts of the west, blow up cities and buildings, terrorize, and cloak their women in black but they get a pass from leaders and liberals.
How are they getting a pass? I've heard this argument a lot but haven't actually seen anyone give an example. I know why that is, but I'm just curious what kind of response I'll get.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
)
:
