Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-12-2008, 02:48 PM
 
Location: Pinal County, Arizona
24,908 posts, read 39,381,198 times
Reputation: 4937

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by roseba View Post
Wouldn't it be more accurate to cite the square footage of HOUSING STARTS?

Because frankly, once you own a home, it's easy to refi or sell, and move on to a larger home. But the first home is a lot harder to obtain.

Please show housing STARTS.
"New" refers to housing STARTS Roseba (new single home)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-12-2008, 07:14 PM
 
Location: Albuquerque
2,296 posts, read 6,305,980 times
Reputation: 1115
I'm not an expert on any of this but my theory is it started in the 80s. My parents started out as solidly middle class back in the 70s when I was born. They bought a $40,000 dollar home (I really do think it was that cheap, and we lived in a nice neighborhood), had average cars, my mother sewed our clothes, etc. My parents put me and my sister in private school because of busing and we had a country club membership. My dad was involved in oil well exploration and drilling, etc. so yes, my parents after about ten years did get rich, but even after they did they were both pretty conservative with money and never flinged it around. I had a tonsilectomy in '77 that I'm pretty sure they paid for with cash; my mom referred to credit cards as "charger plates".

Something changed in the 80s; it became necessary to look and act like the wealthy due to cultural influences like Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous, yuppies, the Royal Family in England (Princess Diana, etc.), lifestyle labels like Ralph Lauren, designer everything, the super models, overnight fame-- stars like Madonna, and the allure of the rich high rolling lifestyle that so many people now covet.

The economy has radically changed since the 70s and people can't get started to even achieve the basic level of middle class prosperity that my parents had without a lot of hard work. Nowadays people want to keep up so they use credit to maintain an appearance of wealth because to not do so is somehow wrong.

Quote:
Originally Posted by boiseguy View Post
I'm curious as to what everyone's opinion is as to the realities involving the declining of the middle class...There was a time when people saved money and purchased cars, houses, appliances, furniture and owned their middle class lifestyle outright. It is my opinion that middle class lifestyles are being purchased by way of lines of credit...We measure our standard of living in our society by what we got and what we can "afford" It is also my opinion that middle class standing for many of us is an illusion, and has caught up with us due to the recent credit crunch's....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2008, 09:39 PM
 
Location: Sacramento
14,045 posts, read 27,318,044 times
Reputation: 7384
Quote:
Originally Posted by roseba View Post
Wouldn't it be more accurate to cite the square footage of HOUSING STARTS?

Because frankly, once you own a home, it's easy to refi or sell, and move on to a larger home. But the first home is a lot harder to obtain.

Please show housing STARTS.
Those were houses built those years listed, how else would you define housing starts (see pg 14)?

While we are complaining about how bad things are today, besides the tremendous size expansion previously stated here are another few facts for you:

- In 1950, the number of new homes with at least 2 baths was 4%, vs 95% in 2006.

- The percentage of new homes with central air conditioning, 0% in 1950, 34% in 1970, 76% in 1990 and 90% in 2006.

- The percentage of new homes with a 2 or more car garage was 0% in 1950, 39% in 1970, 72% in 1990 and 83% in 2006.


http://www.soflo.org/report/NAHBhous...sMarch2006.pdf

Last edited by NewToCA; 02-12-2008 at 09:52 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2008, 11:14 PM
 
11,135 posts, read 14,238,027 times
Reputation: 3696
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewToCA View Post
I really hate to be unsympathetic about this plight but:

The average American house size has more than doubled since the 1950s; it now stands at 2,349 square feet. Whether it's a McMansion in a wealthy neighborhood, or a bigger, cheaper house in the exurbs, the move toward ever large homes has been accelerating for years.

Average size of a new single home:

1950 - 983 sq ft
1970 - 1,500 sq ft
1990 - 2,080 sq ft
2006 - 2,349 sq ft
While not an apt comparison, I was looking at some homeplans from various European sources and noticed their homes are generally much less in sq. footage.

When I moved into my current home, I downsized by about 25% in sq.ft and lost a garage. While it was a pain to toss a bunch of stuff it was also liberating to free oneself from being a slave to junk. In addition I took a good deal of time going over a wide range of floor plans to find the most efficient use of space and in the end have enjoyed the happy return of reduced operating cost.

My utility bills are half of my previous home and I have subsequently put those savings into more productive use such as upgrades, improvements in energy efficiency and more land.

While I happen to think the middle class is in decline, much of the reasons for this decline are self inflicted as they are due to government. I can say with some certainty that the majority of my friends are living on the credit edge and are one catastrophe away from ruin and for me, that is no way to live.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2008, 08:16 AM
 
372 posts, read 851,972 times
Reputation: 126
I think the largest decline has been in our working class. We have fewer and fewer worker bees, and everyone expects to be compensated like a manager.

Increased credit has allowed people to live outside of their means. Everyone trys to keep up with the Jones' today, with hopes that tomorrow will be fiscally better.

Taxes.... More and more government programs and services that take money out of our pockets so that it can be wasted by others. How many high schools need artificial turf and lights for their football field? The usual explanation is (it's state funded... and if we don't spend it, someone else will). Do powerpoint presentations in every class room work so much better than chalk boards or overhead projectors?

Lawsuits.... If we could somehow set a maximum value on lawsuits, maybe insurance wouldn't be so high. I'ver never lost a loved one to malpractice, but I'm willing to bet that $100 million wouldn't comfort me any more than $1 million.

Volunteerism.... So many feel they need to be compensated for every effort. If citizens would take more pride in their communities maybe our municipalities wouldn't have to spend as much.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2008, 11:17 AM
 
3,570 posts, read 3,780,878 times
Reputation: 1349
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatday View Post
"New" refers to housing STARTS Roseba (new single home)
Alright. I had a different notion in my head.

What are the figures for the low end houses? That is, the first homes that most people buy, before they upsize?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2008, 05:13 PM
 
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
5,190 posts, read 5,035,008 times
Reputation: 908
Here's an example of how things are different..

Parents purchased a house on LI in 1982. Large high rance with LR/DR, EIK 4 Bedrooms (3upstairs on second level.. 4th on the first floor). First floor was where our kids room was etc and 1 car garage. I have a small Levitt house with 4 bedroom s 2 Baths LR and EIK.. it's MUCH samller.. 1/2 the size of my parents.. slightly smaller property. I paid, in interest, on my principal last year more than 1/2 of what my mom and dad's entire mortgage was on the house they bought in 1982.. Yes.. different neighborhood but still a blue collar neighborhood (about the same socioeconomic type area as I grew up).

Pretty sick huh?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2008, 05:57 PM
 
Location: Jonquil City (aka Smyrna) Georgia- by Atlanta
16,259 posts, read 24,858,208 times
Reputation: 3587
In the 60s when I was a kid, I never saw "2 car families". We only had one car and all the other friends I had only had one car. Your "other car" was the MTA bus if you needed it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2008, 06:09 PM
 
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
5,190 posts, read 5,035,008 times
Reputation: 908
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevK View Post
In the 60s when I was a kid, I never saw "2 car families". We only had one car and all the other friends I had only had one car. Your "other car" was the MTA bus if you needed it.

Well.. in the 60's both mommy and daddy didn't have to work full time to afford to live.. Each parent needs a car to trade off pick up and drop offs of the kids at school , events etc. How can a wife who has to get the kids off to school and off to her job also drop hubby off at hte MTA (assuming only one parent works in the city.. maybe both work on LI.. quite possible) (and you can switch it and it cuold be the reverse of my example). then go pick him up after picking up the kids, dropping them at practices, cooking dinner.

One car in today's world is not very practical.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2008, 06:22 PM
 
95 posts, read 84,505 times
Reputation: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by ProLogic View Post
If you cut down on those things I've mentioned you could have more money.
What do you know when you live with "Mommy"???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top