Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
No, people are still allowed to state an opinion. Even the president.
If he attempts to block an investigation, that's another thing.
I believe during the Fast and Furious scandal O was asked a question about the investigation and he said, "I CANNOT comment on an ongoing investigation".
Legal question: Is Obama not an "Accessory After the Fact" for his public comments regarding the FBI investigation into Hillary's emails? Clearly, he was attempting to derail and cast doubt on this ongoing investigation in support of, and in defense of Hillary.
Maybe the Democrats should try respecting the law, and thereby not be subject to criminal investigation? Maybe the Democrats should respect the Constitution of the United States.
Recent polls show Hillary losing in head to head match ups with Trump, Carson, and I believe even Cruz.
She is a liar, and everybody knows it. She cannot be trusted, and everybody knows it.
Hillary is toast, and if the Democrats nominate her, they are incredibly stupid.
She is utterly unqualified because of her dishonesty, and her incompetence.
And...you forgot to include...Hillary is an admitted follower of Alinsky's road to communism, as is Obama!
I don't know about Obama being an "accessory after the fact" but I do know he should not be stating his opinion on this. He did the same thing for Treyvon Martin and Michael Brown which caused the mob to get even bigger and troublesome. After all when you have the president of the united states on your side how could you possibly be wrong?
^This.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough
I believe during the Fast and Furious scandal O was asked a question about the investigation and he said, "I CANNOT comment on an ongoing investigation".
He's very selective in what he chooses to comment on, isn't he?
Legal question: Is Obama not an "Accessory After the Fact" for his public comments regarding the FBI investigation into Hillary's emails? Clearly, he was attempting to derail and cast doubt on this ongoing investigation in support of, and in defense of Hillary.
Surely, you must have something better to do than to think about all the email nonsense. Hillary is not electable, regardless of whether crimes were committed with the email set-up.
No, people are still allowed to state an opinion. Even the president.
If he attempts to block an investigation, that's another thing.
Accessory After the Fact: Definition
Someone who assists another 1) who has committed a felony, 2) after the person has committed the felony, 3) with knowledge that the person committed the felony, and 4) with the intent to help the person avoid arrest or punishment. An accessory after the fact may be held liable for, inter alia, obstruction of justice.
Did you not read the very definition you linked to? I would guess 'not'.
You would be guessing wrong. I did read it, and that is why I posed the question. I believe, based on the definition I linked to, that he very much is an "accessory after the fact."
I have no idea why, with the entire Republican Party and every News Media just waiting for a word they can twist into ropes to hang him with.
Only in the O-cult world is O inserting himself where he shouldn't, considered the media or GOP's fault. O-messiah is never wrong, ever.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.