Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: My feelings and thoughts on this are most closely expressed by the following statement:
I lean conservative and think less is better from our government, but I certainly support this move. 13 59.09%
I lean liberal and believe that more government is better and therefore of course I support this. 0 0%
I am a die-hard libertarian and this is an outrage. The government is overreaching again and has no business interfering with these people. 0 0%
These scammers are the scum of the Earth and should be executed right next to Dylann Roof. I am not kidding. 9 40.91%
Voters: 22. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-19-2015, 01:19 PM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,513,185 times
Reputation: 10096

Advertisements

I lean conservative and I think this is great. These scam calls are at once illegal and immensely annoying. The perpetrators of these robocalls are criminals and this is the least that should be done to pursue them.

Of course it may be that the FCC messes this up yet. As we all know, the FCC has been out of control under Barack Obama, and of course more broadly speaking, Barack Obama has been out of control with his unconstitutional use of executive orders, violating existing laws, and intentionally circumventing the will of Congress at every turn.

So, all that being said, I want to take this opportunity to tip my hat to the current Obama appointee-dominated FCC for getting something right for a change.

Quote:
FCC Moves To Block Robocalls

The Federal Communications Commission on Thursday agreed that Verizon, AT&T and other telecommunication carriers aren’t duty-bound to connect those annoying “robocalls” if a consumer doesn’t want them. Consumer groups and several states had asked the agency to clarify this point because phone companies have said they worried about running afoul of rules that require them to connect every call.

FCC commissioners mostly agreed that call blocking technology or “do not disturb” services should not only be allowed but encouraged. The question now is whether the phone companies have the technology to do it in a way consumers want.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-19-2015, 01:26 PM
 
79,913 posts, read 44,167,332 times
Reputation: 17209
This will be like the do not call list. Passed and then largely unenforced.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2015, 01:28 PM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,513,185 times
Reputation: 10096
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
This will be like the do not call list. Passed and then largely unenforced.
The key is whether the phone companies have the technology to effectively screen these calls out.

In fact, you could see how phone companies with more advanced technologies that are willing to deploy them could be at a competitive advantage from a marketing perspective to those who don't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2015, 01:31 PM
 
20,524 posts, read 15,895,818 times
Reputation: 5948
The 1 kind of robocall that needs to stay "legal" are of the reverse 911 kind. Like when the cops or FD are trying to let everybody know something bad's getting ready to happen or already did.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2015, 01:31 PM
 
79,913 posts, read 44,167,332 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713 View Post
The key is whether the phone companies have the technology to effectively screen these calls out.
"Sign up with our Verizon business plan and no blocked calls".

This is most likely a business decision. A way to get more revenue. Or the company will charge you to block certain calls.

Quote:
In fact, you could see how phone companies with more advanced technologies that are willing to deploy them could be at a competitive advantage from a marketing perspective to those who don't.
Sure, less competition is good for those that remain.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2015, 01:47 PM
 
45,201 posts, read 26,417,923 times
Reputation: 24964
I hate them, but the guv has no business dictating who calls who. Just hang up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2015, 03:17 PM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,513,185 times
Reputation: 10096
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
I hate them, but the guv has no business dictating who calls who. Just hang up.
What the FCC is proposing is an option for customers to opt out of receiving these calls, at which point the phone companies would block them. Right now the phone companies say they cannot do this, because they are required by law to put through ALL calls.

Just FYI.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2015, 04:23 PM
 
Location: Free From The Oppressive State
30,251 posts, read 23,719,256 times
Reputation: 38625
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713 View Post
I lean conservative and I think this is great. These scam calls are at once illegal and immensely annoying. The perpetrators of these robocalls are criminals and this is the least that should be done to pursue them.

Of course it may be that the FCC messes this up yet. As we all know, the FCC has been out of control under Barack Obama, and of course more broadly speaking, Barack Obama has been out of control with his unconstitutional use of executive orders, violating existing laws, and intentionally circumventing the will of Congress at every turn.

So, all that being said, I want to take this opportunity to tip my hat to the current Obama appointee-dominated FCC for getting something right for a change.
AT&T already has the technology. They will block 900 numbers if you ask them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2015, 05:09 PM
 
18,984 posts, read 9,067,948 times
Reputation: 14688
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
I hate them, but the guv has no business dictating who calls who. Just hang up.
Customers have a right to ask their carriers not to put through these calls, though, just as they have the right to ask that telemarketers not be put through. I'm all for it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2015, 07:28 PM
 
19,717 posts, read 10,109,755 times
Reputation: 13074
"Hi, this is Rachel from card services". I would like to stuff that phone down her throat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top