Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-25-2014, 10:51 AM
 
19,735 posts, read 10,168,966 times
Reputation: 13097

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by another_hot-day View Post
The people in the streets of Ferguson were't listening to him anyway. They didn't listen past the "not true" statement of the prosecutor. I watched them all disperse the moment that was said. They had their marching orders.
They were going to riot, the verdict didn't matter. Either way was an excuse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-25-2014, 10:52 AM
 
15,063 posts, read 6,196,877 times
Reputation: 5124
Quote:
Originally Posted by PuddingPops View Post
The guy is so out of touch, he genuinely seems to believe the encounter between Brown and Wilson was racially motivated, and no amount of evidence will convince him otherwise.

If he was a proper leader, he would have shut it down a long time ago and told the nation that we should all let the grand jury do its job and not speculate about racial factors. The end.

Instead he comes out and enables certain nefarious elements of the black community -- who were proudly on display last night -- to engage in lawlessness, because, after all, "we still have strides to make in civil rights". Blacks, always a victimized people. Thanks for the uplifting message, Mr. President.
Really? Where are you getting that from his statements? He is addressing the sentiments that exist, rather than his personal feelings on the matter.

Funny how you see it that way...I could see certain white americans and black americans with racial issues being bothered by his statements though. Why? Because it doesn't "favor" either group enough...more similar than different sometimes. LOL.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2014, 10:53 AM
 
Location: Palo Alto
12,149 posts, read 8,433,910 times
Reputation: 4190
Any comments from the President claiming we are a nation of laws after he just broke 220 years of established precedent are meaningless.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2014, 10:55 AM
 
4,571 posts, read 3,527,035 times
Reputation: 3261
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapperJohn View Post
Any comments from the President claiming we are a nation of laws after he just broke 220 years of established precedent are meaningless.
Yup. The racist-in-chief is as lawless as the rioters he was encouraging.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2014, 10:56 AM
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,626 posts, read 16,607,956 times
Reputation: 6065
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapperJohn View Post
Any comments from the President claiming we are a nation of laws after he just broke 220 years of established precedent are meaningless.
because President Obama is the first President to issue an executive order on Immigration ?????????????
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2014, 10:59 AM
 
Location: Spokane, WA
1,989 posts, read 2,540,044 times
Reputation: 2363
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
because President Obama is the first President to issue an executive order on Immigration ?????????????
Reagan and Bush did their executive action's AFTER it was approved legislation from Congress. And more to the point....none of them should be doing it. Ever.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2014, 11:02 AM
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,626 posts, read 16,607,956 times
Reputation: 6065
Quote:
Originally Posted by aplcr0331 View Post
Reagan and Bush did their executive action's AFTER it was approved legislation from Congress. And more to the point....none of them should be doing it. Ever.
It doesnt matter if they did it afterwards. It was still an executive order that changed what was currently in that law.That being said Reagan's executive order came before Congress' legislation.

and further more, the constitution gives Presidents the power to use executive orders. You may disagree with the action itself, but not whether they can do it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2014, 11:09 AM
 
Location: Colorado
6,870 posts, read 9,404,474 times
Reputation: 8911
Once CNN mentioned that the President was going to speak, I turned off the TV. Couldn't care less what he thinks about this situation and I'm not sure that commenting on the situation was helpful.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2014, 11:14 AM
 
Location: The land where cats rule
10,908 posts, read 9,569,729 times
Reputation: 3602
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post


Regardless of if you agree that the shooting itself was racial, the discussions around it for 4 months have been about race.

You telling him to not talk about race is the embodiment of "sweeping it under the rug".
The race issue was put forth by the MSM and agitators, like Al Sharpton, when none existed at the outset. More like pulling it from the hate closet to throw out there than "sweeping it under the rug". And Obama did show his racism by inserting it into his nationally televised remarks.

Still, I think that he did a reasonable job with his remarks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2014, 11:15 AM
 
Location: Living near our Nation's Capitol since 2010
2,218 posts, read 3,458,192 times
Reputation: 6035
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
It doesnt matter if they did it afterwards. It was still an executive order that changed what was currently in that law.That being said Reagan's executive order came before Congress' legislation.

and further more, the constitution gives Presidents the power to use executive orders. You may disagree with the action itself, but not whether they can do it.
Of course it matters! Reagan and Bush followed the checks-and-balances way of governing. They did NOT take the law into their own hands without Congress. Can't you see the difference here? It is a mighty BIG difference.

This president seems intent on going against what the majority of citizens (yeah, you know, those who actually HAVE citizenship legally) want. Why do you suppose so many are furious at his unilateral decision to do such an unwelcomed and sweeping stunt?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top