Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
With the fixes to the website taking hold, Obama is looking better than he was a month ago and is heading in the right direction in the latest CBS/NYT poll. He still has a ways to go to get back to his numbers earlier in the year. The economy is poised to take off next year, and as time goes by the Obamacare rollout fiasco will fade from memory. Things are looking up for Obama.
Does it really matter? They are just polling the people who reelected Obama, or sat on their hands and allowed him to be reelected. Some of these polls are just polling "adults" which includes many ignorant, uninformed people.
Where have you been? Jeff Zients was hired weeks ago to take charge of fixing the website. He is the one who said it would function properly by Dec 1. He was largely successful though work continues to be done.
LOL......"largely successful".
If this were the Olympics, that would be Comedy Gold.
From what I see only the name has change from Bush to Obama.If you don't want the game to be play the don't create the game.Kind of reminds me of people who complain when the Tea Party have protest rallies; perhaps they need to review their in protest. and what occurs to really judge who is more civilized.
Who asserted they released statistics, or is it your assertion that they are lying again?
What are you basing this statement on?
Quote:
The Obama administrated admitted it was true. How long until you actually catch up to the rest of us in regards to reality?
What was the "press release" from the Obama administration that released actual statistics that backs up "more people are paying more and losing their doctors because of Obamacare?"
No, I am asking for the statistics that the Obama administration released that back up your assertion.
In other words, you're naïve and "hope"ful enough to actually believe that this or any other administration would actually release statistics which, while they would be truthful, would actually prove that there are problems with one of their initiatives.
Wow! I want some of what you're smoking and a map to the dream world you live in.
Interesting. So if you're saying Romney would be dishonestly taking credit for how our economy is improving a year after he was elected, then what does that say about Obama blaming Bush for how bad the economy was in 2009, 2010, and 2011 after he was elected in 2008?
Yep. I am saying that Romney and the Republicans would have been dishonest and taken credit for the improved economy instead of giving the credit to Obama, where it belongs.
Obama was honest enough to give credit to Bush for the failing economy when Obama took office.
In other words, you're naïve and "hope"ful enough to actually believe that this or any other administration would actually release statistics which, while they would be truthful, would actually prove that there are problems with one of their initiatives.
Wow! I want some of what you're smoking and a map to the dream world you live in.
What I am saying is that I am not so naive to believe talking heads on a propagandist program. I like to see actual facts before I go off on an opinion tour.
Let me ask you; how did you conduct your independent research for your findings in the above bold?
That's rich. YOU demanding independent research. As if...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.