Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-13-2013, 09:34 AM
 
12,282 posts, read 13,252,553 times
Reputation: 4985

Advertisements

Good or Bad? Let's here it. What benefits for the worker?


GOP pushes paid time off in lieu of overtime

Rep. Martha Roby, R-Ala., called on the Senate to pass legislation that would allow employers to offer employees paid time off in exchange for overtime pay in the weekly Republican address on Saturday, framing the legislation, which she herself shepherded to passage in the House this week, as a way to give working families more flexibility in how they spend their time

"Talk to just about any mom or dad and they'll tell you they wish they had more time," Roby said. "While we may not be able to legislate another hour into the day, we can help working Americans better balance life's demands by offering more flexibility for time away from work."

Roby said her bill, the Working Families Flexibility Act, would "remove an outdated and unnecessary restriction on private-sector employees accruing comp time, or paid time off, in exchange for overtime."

It's not a new concept, Roby said, noting that "many employees in the public sector enjoy this benefit right now" thanks to a 1985 law allowing local and state governments to offer their employees the option of paid time off.

Anticipating Democrats' criticism that the bill will shred the protections built into labor law, Roby said, "What this bill doesn't do is change the 40-hour work week or how overtime pay is calculated. The same protections that have been a part of labor law for decades remain."

House passes GOP measure to offer PTO alternative to overtime pay

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., apparently couldn't disagree more. She slammed Roby's legislation in a news conference on Thursday, saying it "gives less flexibility to working people, more discretion to their bosses."

"It ends the 40-hour work week," she said. "It cuts pay for women, undermines the economic security of the middle class, gives an interest-free loan, paid for by workers' wages and unused comp time, to the company."

In a statement released in March, Pelosi similarly derided the bill as "an assault on workers' wages and the 40-hour work week."

"Most workers, living from paycheck to paycheck, will be hard-pressed to reject an employer's request to use comp time, therefore losing much-needed cash to pay the bills," Pelosi said.

The Obama administration, for its part, threatened to veto Roby's bill in its current form if it ever reaches the president's desk.

"This legislation undermines the existing right to hard-earned overtime pay, on which many working families rely to make ends meet, while misrepresenting itself as a workplace flexibility measure that gives power to employees over their own schedules," said the Office of Management and Budget in a statement. "If the president were presented with this legislation in its current form, his senior advisors would recommend that he veto the bill."

Despite opposition from congressional Democrats and a threatened veto from the White House, Roby called on the Senate to pass the bill in her address on Saturday, and she urged the president "to listen to the working parents of our country and promise them he'll sign this bill into law when it reaches his desk."




GOP pushes paid time off in lieu of overtime - CBS News
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-13-2013, 09:35 AM
 
Location: The Brat Stop
8,347 posts, read 7,248,987 times
Reputation: 2279
I don't like it, or appreciate it either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2013, 09:37 AM
 
Location: MS
4,395 posts, read 4,916,817 times
Reputation: 1564
Why is the government telling a business how it should run?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2013, 09:38 AM
 
Location: The Brat Stop
8,347 posts, read 7,248,987 times
Reputation: 2279
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert_J View Post
Why is the government telling a business how it should run?
Because republicans are for less government intervention.
Oh what was the question?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2013, 09:40 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,267,512 times
Reputation: 17209
There is already a long thread on this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2013, 09:43 AM
 
20,480 posts, read 12,402,260 times
Reputation: 10291
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert_J View Post
Why is the government telling a business how it should run?
Government telling business how it should run is not the question.

The primary role of government is to stand in the way of predation. overtime laws were put in place because of preditory practice of businesses.

The issue is what is the limit of what government should do?

In this case maybe the answer is in the middle. allow the flexability this bill offers but give workers the option to pick overtime or paid time off?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2013, 09:46 AM
 
Location: Huntersville/Charlotte, NC and Washington, DC
26,701 posts, read 41,775,771 times
Reputation: 41381
Bad idea. If overtime is needed, what makes Roby think the employees are ever going to have the employers approve PTO requests without any laws that guarantee vacation time for any employee?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2013, 09:48 AM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,466,286 times
Reputation: 4243
I see Lefties are really pro-choice. LMAO! There is NOTHING wrong with this. AT ALL!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2013, 09:48 AM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,756,787 times
Reputation: 14746
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert_J View Post
Why is the government telling a business how it should run?
Because government controls the central bank, which creates every dollar in existence.

I submit that if businesses don't want to play by government rules (which is fine), then they shouldn't be allowed to hold or use dollars.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2013, 09:57 AM
 
Location: Va. Beach
6,391 posts, read 5,172,716 times
Reputation: 2283
It's not in lieu of. Comprehension problems anyone?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top