Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
994 people from 21 countries were interviewed, which would average about 48 people from each country, and 48 people represent millions of people that live in their country? And you call that a credible poll? Then you go on to blatantly lie in the title of your thread. I wonder how many people they had to "interview" before they found the 48 people they were looking for. They probably went looking for Muslims that had a thumbprint on their forehead, a long shaggy beard and bad teeth.
This is just too funny. So now you are a Statistician? Are you more qualified that the poll center to determine what a sufficient random sample size would be? Thought so.
This is an excellent example of where conservatives use facts, and liberals use emotion to try and debate issues. The polls don't go in the liberals favor, so what do they do - they attack the poll's administrators, except in this case, the PEW center is very LIBERAL.
IT IS JUST HILARIOUS how the liberals start attacking the poll - before they even realize that the service is a well known LIBERAL facility.
East of the Transjordan river was also part of the Palestine Mandate. When that land was cut off from the Mandate the new country was called Transjordan and later shortened to Jordan. So what was the land to the west of the river supposed to be called?
East of the Transjordan river was also part of the Palestine Mandate. When that land was cut off from the Mandate the new country was called Transjordan and later shortened to Jordan. So what was the land to the west of the river supposed to be called?
Arabistan? LOL
Too bad the Jews got short-changed on east "palestine" They could have made it into a success like Israel, instead of Jordan being a third-world craphole
This is just too funny. So now you are a Statistician? Are you more qualified that the poll center to determine what a sufficient random sample size would be? Thought so.
This is an excellent example of where conservatives use facts, and liberals use emotion to try and debate issues. The polls don't go in the liberals favor, so what do they do - they attack the poll's administrators, except in this case, the PEW center is very LIBERAL.
IT IS JUST HILARIOUS how the liberals start attacking the poll - before they even realize that the service is a well known LIBERAL facility.
WHOOPSIE!
You're the only one bringing the left/right paradigm into this.
The fact is, 994 people polled from 21 countries is -not-a good sampling size, therefore this poll is pretty useless.
There's no "emotion" in this statement. Just logic.
Do you believe that suicide bombing could ever be justified in defense of your family? Do you believe that suicide bombing could ever be justified in defense of your nation?
No, and no. Suicide bombing against civilians to achieve anything is unjustifiable. Sorry, but I live in a nation of laws, where we rely upon the legal system to administer justice. As for wartime, have Westerners EVER, EVER engaged in suicide bombings against civilians? Did even the jews being slaughtered in Europe retaliate against german civilians? Did US colonialists suicide bomb the British during the War of Independence? Sorry but that is a non-Western tactic that I do not accept.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
