Benghazi terrorist attacks and the Whistleblowers (Taliban, illegal, soldier, weapons)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So the contention that the 3 officials that testified yesterday was incorrect, now we have a 4th whistleblower, tell me why this was not brought up at the hearings yesterday.
Because those three didn't give the right the damning evidence they wanted. Expect more "whistleblowers" to keep coming out of the woodwork until they can find the right one who will give voice to the conclusions they decided on long before the first hearing was held. I'm surprised you didn't figure that out.
No comparison between attacks during Bush and Obama's Benghazi
You are absolutely right, there is no comparison between the many, many embassy attacks during the Bush administration and Benghazi. Here's the main difference. Following the many, many attacks on the embassies during the Bush years, not once did the opposition party hold a single hearing, much less numerous hearings, demanding that the administration account for every word that was spoken in the chaos and aftermath of the situation. Not once, even though there were many, many attacks on embassies during Bush's tenure in the White House. I repeat, not once.
So what contradictory statements might that previous administration have come up with? We will never know, because instead of dragging the country through numerous hearings, the opposition party accepted the well known truth that embassies are dangerous places, mourned our dead, and directed our wrath and all of our energy toward punishing the perpetrators who actually caused said deaths. Something that I notice is of little interest to the right wingers here.
Because those three didn't give the right the damning evidence they wanted. Expect more "whistleblowers" to keep coming out of the woodwork until they can find the right one who will give voice to the conclusions they decided on long before the first hearing was held. I'm surprised you didn't figure that out.
There seems to be so much focus on the vidoe and Susan Rice's statements shortly after the attack, aren't there more important things to discuss, or is that the only remaining issue.
I heard Dick Cheney is recommending that they subpoena Hillary Clinton, the first time wasn't enough.
The attack was the largest scale attack against any US consulate, so that alone makes it a big deal. Imagine if more attacks on this scale were launched against other consulates and embassies? How are we supposed to defend against them, unless the host country is ready to increase their level of preparedness and both their and our rapid response forces are greatly expanded.
How many other consulates did we have where no government existed and need to rely on local militia for protection. Host country?? No country.
There seems to be so much focus on the vidoe and Susan Rice's statements shortly after the attack, aren't there more important things to discuss, or is that the only remaining issue.
I heard Dick Cheney is recommending that they subpoena Hillary Clinton, the first time wasn't enough.
The video = lie, perpetuated by people at the highest levels in government You don't think it's important to get to the bottom of this? Yes, Clinton should definitely be brought back, and someone should tell her what difference it makes. Maybe she'll feel the heat and tell the truth this time around.
The video = lie, perpetuated by people at the highest levels in government You don't think it's important to get to the bottom of this? Yes, Clinton should definitely be brought back, and someone should tell her what difference it makes. Maybe she'll feel the heat and tell the truth this time around.
Don't you realize, it would only be important if it were republicans. Immediately the left wing spin is working overtime.
Tell us one time where liberal media points out that Obama did anything wrong. They don't, they prop him up as if he is perfect. MSNBC Chris Matthews even said Obama is the perfect man.
Aside from Al Sharpton, they do it all the time - often to the point that Obama supporters roll their eyes at how silly they get. As examples, they criticize him for not closing Guantanamo Bay, for proposing to switch Social Security increases to chained CPI, and in general for attempting to deal with republicans.
This is what a scumbag, lying murderer looks like.
This is also who stupid liberals will vote for in 2016 for president.
And what your next President of the United States will look like, too.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
