Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-04-2013, 12:51 AM
 
4,765 posts, read 3,754,938 times
Reputation: 3038

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by cb73 View Post
The expanded MediCaid programs is only being funded by the Feds until 2016. After that, any state that accepted it now will be on the hook to pay for it then. That's why so many Republican states declined--they saw no budgetary means absorb those extra costs.

And PLEASE stop with all the "conservatives did this" and conservatives did that" stuff. Not ONE SINGLE REPUBLICAN vote went into this mess.

Democratics own it. Live with it.
It seems this is more political (as Supposn contends) than economic:

"If the states decide to Opt-Out of Medicaid expansion, ObamaCare itself will have to step up to the plate and insure these individuals via the ObamaCare Health Exchanges. The problem is that this will likely raise everyone's health insurance, including those with private insurance.
This means that anti-ObamaCare states who reject Medicaid will not only hurt their poorest, it will affect every tax paying American and every American who has health insurance."

'New York, Arizona and Maine expanded Medicaid between 2000 and 2005. A Harvard study reports, "rates of uninsured residents dropped, access to care improved, and more people reported being in very good or excellent health". The coverage was estimated to save a total of 2,840 lives a year for the states.'

True, that the GOP refused to take part in any form of health care reform in the US. Sad, but true.
Perhaps their input would have led to improvements. Or would that be impossible?

And no matter if it is wildly successful, they will continue to look for negatives to exploit for political gain.

I suspect there will be plenty of people who would rather "live with it", than die without it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top