Why not Obama instead of Rice? (Limbaugh, McCain, Congress, Clinton)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Please educate me. Why all the attention, fixation and so much media coverage regarding Susan Rice, when, it was Obama himself that went to the United Nations and made that speech regarding the alleged video. He even sort of admitted he is the one who gave the talking points to her. It seems to me what he did was far worse. Going before the UN making a fool out of himself and the United States. Where am I going wrong?
Please educate me. Why all the attention, fixation and so much media coverage regarding Susan Rice, when, it was Obama himself that went to the United Nations and made that speech regarding the alleged video. He even sort of admitted he is the one who gave the talking points to her. It seems to me what he did was far worse. Going before the UN making a fool out of himself and the United States. Where am I going wrong?
The onion must first be peeled to get to the rotten core (Obama) inside.
He is a coward who likes to hide behind women's skirts and the MSM lets him get away with it.
Get you head out of Fox News' and/or Limbaugh's rear end to hear and believe what they say, and get educated about how the President challenged the idiots who went after Rice who wasn't even around to defend self.
Get you head out of Fox News' and/or Limbaugh's rear end to hear and believe what they say, and get educated about how the President challenged the idiots who went after Rice who wasn't even around to defend self.
I'm not not sure what Rush or Fox have to do with this, but they sure are convenient whipping dogs for libs to hide behind when their godling is exposed as a sniveling coward.
Who originally took responsibility for Benghazi? Hmm?
Who let Rice go out and make a fool of herself on national television? Hmm?
Regarding Fox News. They always bring on very articulate liberals to give that side of each and every issue. I hear way more of the liberal spin than I care to hear on Fox News. Now, the problem as has been stated above, is with the MSM which is so into Obama's you know what, never ask any follow up questions to the BS he spouts like Old Faithful. It is creepy what is going on in this country.
I'm not not sure what Rush or Fox have to do with this, but they sure are convenient whipping dogs for libs to hide behind when their godling is exposed as a sniveling coward.
Who originally took responsibility for Benghazi? Hmm?
Who let Rice go out and make a fool of herself on national television? Hmm?
That's some guy you admire and defend.
I find that when poster go, mindless and vacuously, after Fox News, Rush, Sean, Mark etc., they have nothing to stand on except the soles of their feet. Dismiss them as irrelevant, I say.
Please educate me. Why all the attention, fixation and so much media coverage regarding Susan Rice, when, it was Obama himself that went to the United Nations and made that speech regarding the alleged video. He even sort of admitted he is the one who gave the talking points to her. It seems to me what he did was far worse. Going before the UN making a fool out of himself and the United States. Where am I going wrong?
You would have to ask Senile McCain and his two suck up lapdog wannabes, Kelly and Lindsey about the fixation on Rice. But as far as the issue, the assessment of the information that was available`at the time presented. If people actually listen to what Rice said, there were no definitive conclusions yet made. But, Ol' Senile John is still in 2008 mode.
The fixation on Susan Rice is not a fixation on Susan Rice. It's a fixation on being obstructionist with regards to this President's policies and proposals. The Republican Party's strategy during the first four years was to fight the President on everything. I think the level of dissatisfaction with Congress as a whole should indicate to the Republican Party that they would be better served choosing their fights, rather than just fighting on everything. There has been strong indications that President Obama would appoint Susan Rice as Hillary Clinton's replacement for Secretary of State. The Republican Party seems to intend to oppose that appointment. And the current criticism of Susan Rice lays the groundwork for that opposition.
I'm not not sure what Rush or Fox have to do with this, but they sure are convenient whipping dogs for libs to hide behind when their godling is exposed as a sniveling coward.
Ignorance on the subject. This is President Obama:
"As I've said before she made an appearance at the request of the White House in which she gave her best understanding of the intelligence that had been provided to her. If Senator McCain and Senator Graham and others want to go after somebody, they should go after me and I'm happy to have that discussion with them. But for them to go after the UN Ambassador who had nothing to do with Benghazi and was simply making a presentation based on intelligence she had received and to besmirch her reputation is outrageous."
And you demonstrate ALL the traits of a Fox News and Limbaugh believer... but that didn't start with this thread either.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
