Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-29-2012, 07:55 AM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
9,701 posts, read 5,118,342 times
Reputation: 4270

Advertisements

A 2nd amendment-hating commie.

The only reason the "gun walking" was allowed to happen was b/c of 3 laws the nra and gun lobby pushed.
  • Gun sales at gun shows are legal
  • Gun transfers after the sale are legal
  • Gun transfers are only illegal if you have proof that the intent of the purchase was to commit a crime

Even calling the op gun walking is a lie, since those guns were legal purchases b/c of the above.

So Conservatives either need top drop the faux outrage, trumped up charges, and partisan bs our jon hands w those that want to enact common sense regulations on gun sales.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-29-2012, 12:16 PM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,868,581 times
Reputation: 20030
Quote:
Originally Posted by EddieB.Good View Post
A 2nd amendment-hating commie.

The only reason the "gun walking" was allowed to happen was b/c of 3 laws the nra and gun lobby pushed.
  • Gun sales at gun shows are legal
  • Gun transfers after the sale are legal
  • Gun transfers are only illegal if you have proof that the intent of the purchase was to commit a crime

Even calling the op gun walking is a lie, since those guns were legal purchases b/c of the above.

So Conservatives either need top drop the faux outrage, trumped up charges, and partisan bs our jon hands w those that want to enact common sense regulations on gun sales.
uhm, wrong. first, yes gun sales at gun shows are legal, business owners still need to do a background check though, and buyers from business owners still need to fill out the 4473(?) form. private sakes on the other hand are an issue.

yes gun transfers after the sale are legal, IF you are not transferring the weapon to someone who cannot by law purchase a firearm, AND you have an FFL do the transfer paperwork. you do not have to have proof of intent to commit a crime for a gun transfer to be illegal. and that right there makes gun walking illegal since these guns were in fat going to people WHO COULD NOT OTHERWISE BUY GUNS LEGALLY IN THIS COUNTRY. nice try but you fail completely.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2012, 12:21 PM
 
30,077 posts, read 18,686,783 times
Reputation: 20896
Quote:
Originally Posted by EddieB.Good View Post
A 2nd amendment-hating commie.


The only reason the "gun walking" was allowed to happen was b/c of 3 laws the nra and gun lobby pushed.
  • Gun sales at gun shows are legal
  • Gun transfers after the sale are legal
  • Gun transfers are only illegal if you have proof that the intent of the purchase was to commit a crime
Even calling the op gun walking is a lie, since those guns were legal purchases b/c of the above.

So Conservatives either need top drop the faux outrage, trumped up charges, and partisan bs our jon hands w those that want to enact common sense regulations on gun sales.

It is interesting to see how confused liberals have become. You do realize that the whole operation was an attempt to LIMIT gun sales in the US.

Fast and Furious was a failed policy that did not even bother to GPS track the guns. Why? They really did not care where they ended up. Further, Fast and Furious is worse than Watergate. Why?

1. No one died in Watergate
2. hundreds died in fast and furious
3. The coverup for fast and furious is more widespread than Watergate

Obama may see some jail time over this. If he is elected again (which is unlikely), it is probable that he will face the same impeachment process that Nixon faced.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2012, 12:26 PM
 
Location: The Woods
18,358 posts, read 26,513,800 times
Reputation: 11351
Sales across state lines without an FFL involved is illegal at present.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2012, 05:09 PM
 
Location: Lost in Texas
9,827 posts, read 6,941,788 times
Reputation: 3416
Does anyone else find it curious that the guns used in the Brian Terry "murder" were left behind? Why would a drug smuggler or illegal alien smuggler leave behind their weapon? I have my opinion, but I'll let the liberals hang themselves with their explanation on this one..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2012, 05:19 PM
 
Location: Gone
25,231 posts, read 16,952,501 times
Reputation: 5932
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
It is interesting to see how confused liberals have become. You do realize that the whole operation was an attempt to LIMIT gun sales in the US.

Fast and Furious was a failed policy that did not even bother to GPS track the guns. Why? They really did not care where they ended up. Further, Fast and Furious is worse than Watergate. Why?

1. No one died in Watergate
2. hundreds died in fast and furious
3. The coverup for fast and furious is more widespread than Watergate

Obama may see some jail time over this. If he is elected again (which is unlikely), it is probable that he will face the same impeachment process that Nixon faced.
Fast and Furious was a failure. That said please show where the President of the United States of America was the one behind it all and running the show.
At Watergate crimes were committed, were any crimes committed during Fast and Furious?
You know how many died due to the program, got proof and links?
Was it, seems like it was a little too well known to me.
May? I seriously doubt that, but go ahead keep on wishing on something off the charts to get him out of office, God knows Romney is not going to win the election.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2012, 05:27 PM
 
5,036 posts, read 5,141,224 times
Reputation: 2356
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casper in Dallas View Post
Fast and Furious was a failure. That said please show where the President of the United States of America was the one behind it all and running the show.
At Watergate crimes were committed, were any crimes committed during Fast and Furious?
You know how many died due to the program, got proof and links?
Was it, seems like it was a little too well known to me.
May? I seriously doubt that, but go ahead keep on wishing on something off the charts to get him out of office, God knows Romney is not going to win the election.
I dont think anyone thought seriously that Obama had anything to do with it. However, rushing to the aide of Holder to invoke EP after Holder said earlier in the year that hed never call for that, raises questions now.

How do you know no crimes were committed here? Did you see the docs that they are trying their damnedest to keep under lock and key? If you have, do tell. Because id love to know what it is they are so willing to go through all this to try and keep secret.

If nothing in those documents were damaging to Holder, Obama, or someone else in the Admin, do you honestly believe they would go through all this to keep it such a secret? To tell the Terry family, screw off no one sees the docs but us?

Its time you liberals put party aside, just once. Once. Is there anything you people will not excuse or defend. This is a cover up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2012, 06:20 PM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,374,090 times
Reputation: 7990
Quote:
Originally Posted by EddieB.Good View Post
A 2nd amendment-hating commie.


The only reason the "gun walking" was allowed to happen was b/c of 3 laws the nra and gun lobby pushed.
  • Gun sales at gun shows are legal
  • Gun transfers after the sale are legal
  • Gun transfers are only illegal if you have proof that the intent of the purchase was to commit a crime
Even calling the op gun walking is a lie, since those guns were legal purchases b/c of the above.

So Conservatives either need top drop the faux outrage, trumped up charges, and partisan bs our jon hands w those that want to enact common sense regulations on gun sales.
I don't think your argument gets off the ground. In my reading about F&F, I haven't seen any suggestion that gun shows, or private sales ('transfers after the sale') were involved. If you have such info, provide a link. I don't think it is the case. All the sales were made thru dealers, w/ full NICs check and 4473 filing. So bullet points 1 & 2 are irrelevant.

Straw purchases (purchases by a non-felon, legal buyer at the behest of a non-legal buyer) are illegal. The NRA has never tried to block that law. Is it a difficult crime to prove? Sure, as many crimes are. People do get away with crimes frequently on the basis that it can be difficult to prove intent. But by the same token, it is possible to prove intent, and cops have ways of doing it, and successfully do it frequently. We had a cop killed here in the Seattle area, and the guy who sold the gun to him was convicted of illegally selling guns.
Seller of gun in Seattle cop slaying pleads guilty | Local & Regional | Seattle News, Weather, Sports, Breaking News | KOMO News

"Gun walking," I believe was a term that originated from the BATF. So you're saying that the BATF was lying about its own op? The BATF knew that these were straw purchases. That's why they called it 'gun walking.' And that's why some BATF agents objected to the operation. And why BATF supervisor David Voth had to try to assuage and threaten the agents who objected.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2012, 06:22 PM
 
5,036 posts, read 5,141,224 times
Reputation: 2356
Issa, Grassley release details about Fast and Furious whistleblower retaliation, cover-up



Issa, Grassley release details about Fast and Furious whistleblower retaliation, cover-up | The Daily Caller


Quote:
“We just learned that ATF senior management placed two of the main whistleblowers who have testified before Congress about Fast and Furious under the supervision of someone who vowed to retaliate against them,” they wrote before describing how senior political figures have made dangerous threats before.

Grassley and Issa said that in early 2011, right around the time Grassley first made public the whistleblowers’ allegations about Fast and Furious, Scot Thomasson – then the chief of the ATF’s Public Affairs Division – said, according to an eyewitness account: “We need to get whatever dirt we can on these guys [the whistleblowers] and take them down.”

Thomasson also allegedly said that: “All these whistleblowers have axes to grind. ATF needs to f—k these guys.”

According to Grassley and Issa, when Thomasson was asked about whistleblowers’ allegations that guns were allowed to walk, Thomasson said he “didn’t know and didn’t care.”

Grassley and Issa have given Horowitz until July 6 to answer whether Thomasson was “admonished” for those threats against whistleblowers, how he got his job in the first place and how the DOJ and ATF are going to make sure he doesn’t retaliate against whistleblowers moving forward.

The two lead Fast and Furious investigators also released new, never-before-public documents that show officials in ATF’s Washington headquarters were trying to cover up Fast and Furious two weeks before Grassley ever even asked about it.
Yeah, they were trying to cover this up before even being asked about it. This is a disgrace. This whole "witchhunt" crap from you liberals just doesnt hold water. Something is being covered up. And who knows, maybe Holder isnt exactly protecting himself, but someone else. Either way, what ever the hell they are hiding, they damn well better have to turn over. Lord knows, the longer they stonewall, the more likely they will destroy documents before they are forced to hand them over.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2012, 06:58 PM
 
1,635 posts, read 1,594,899 times
Reputation: 707
They gave weapons to drug cartels. Not too complicated. By the original poster pushing gun control,they actually make the case that this administration had an agenda.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top