Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-21-2012, 07:48 AM
 
7,150 posts, read 10,902,925 times
Reputation: 3806

Advertisements

First proposed in the 1970's by economist James Tobin, later a Nobel Prize winner, the concept of a tax on financial transactions has reignited a revenue movement around the globe.

"Driven by populist anger at bankers as well as government needs for more revenue, the idea of a tax on trades of stocks, bonds and other financial instruments has attracted an array of influential champions, including the leaders of France and Germany, the billionaire philanthropists Bill Gates and George Soros, former Vice President Al Gore, the consumer activist Ralph Nader, Pope Benedict XVI and the archbishop of Canterbury. "

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/07/bu...pagewanted=all
Major New Campaign for A Robin Hood Tax On Wall Street Launches in Boston & Cities Across U.S. with Celebrities, Economists and Activists - PR Newswire - The Sacramento Bee

Robin Hood Tax | Robin Hood Tax
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-21-2012, 01:42 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,291,205 times
Reputation: 3826
Robin Hood didn't steal from wealthy land owners. He stole from the government.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2012, 02:09 PM
 
20,728 posts, read 19,374,196 times
Reputation: 8293
Quote:
Originally Posted by summers73 View Post
Robin Hood didn't steal from wealthy land owners. He stole from the government.

Who were the landed gentry
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2012, 02:15 PM
 
7,150 posts, read 10,902,925 times
Reputation: 3806
No one is proposing "stealing" from anyone ... they are proposing a tax on financial transactions ... just as there are taxes on other products and services across the globe.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2012, 02:15 PM
 
Location: NJ
23,566 posts, read 17,241,593 times
Reputation: 17614
And now endorsed by another nobel prize winner, obama. how could we go wrong?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2012, 02:21 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,291,205 times
Reputation: 3826
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwynedd1 View Post
Who were the landed gentry
From last I understood, Robin Hood stole monies stolen by government through taxation. Seems like the pro-government people would've wanted him burned at the stake as a witch.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2012, 02:22 PM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,949,243 times
Reputation: 12828
So, the very people who screamed bloody murder about the unfairness of higher debit card and credit card transaction fees are the same ones cheering for a "Robin Hood" tax.

My, my, isn't hypocrisy convenient.

Wouldn't the ultimate "fairness" be to go to the pockets of the politicians and their banks wrote the legislation which created the great global banking debacle to begin with? But noooooooo, it will be the consumer, the individual saver/investor, and retiree who gets hit by this the hardest. Your Bill Gates, Warren Buffetts, etc... will barely be touched by this. Their hedge funds will get hit by the fees but it will have very little effect on them personally.

See why banks should not be "too big to fail" and why in the long term no bailout was better than kicking the can down the road?

No, didn't think you would.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2012, 02:23 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,291,205 times
Reputation: 3826
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal View Post
So, the very people who screamed bloody murder about the unfairness of higher debit card and credit card transaction fees are the same ones cheering for a "Robin Hood" tax.

My, my, isn't hypocrisy convenient.

Wouldn't the ultimate "fairness" be to go to the pockets of the politicians and their banks wrote the legislation which created the great global banking debacle to begin with? But noooooooo, it will be the consumer, the individual saver/investor, and retiree who gets hit by this the hardest.

See why banks should not be "too big to fail" and why in the long term no bailout was better than kicking the can down the road?

No, didn't think you would.
b-b-b-b-b-ut we needed a bailout. Obama told us so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2012, 02:26 PM
 
7,150 posts, read 10,902,925 times
Reputation: 3806
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kracer View Post
And now endorsed by another nobel prize winner, obama. how could we go wrong?
Uh, yeah ... except for the pesky fact that Obama hasn't endorsed it ... but why let facts get in the way of partisan knee-jerking, right?

From the linked NYT article you could have read before making an uninformed comment:

"The Obama administration has also been lukewarm, expressing sympathy but saying it would be hard to execute, could drive trading overseas and would hurt pension funds and individual investors in addition to banks.
Administration officials say they would prefer a tax on the assets of the largest banks as a way to discourage them from risky activities. “The president is sympathetic to the goals that a financial transactions tax is trying to achieve and he is pushing for a financial crisis responsibility fee and closing other Wall Street loopholes as the best and most feasible way to achieve those goals,” an administration official said."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2012, 02:32 PM
 
7,150 posts, read 10,902,925 times
Reputation: 3806
Quote:
Originally Posted by summers73 View Post
From last I understood, Robin Hood stole monies stolen by government through taxation. Seems like the pro-government people would've wanted him burned at the stake as a witch.
Again: taxation isn't stealing. It is legal revenue collection.
So Robin Hood stole money from the government.
But the government hadn't technically stolen from the people.

In this case, the tax proposed isn't stealing from the people or the government.
There are financial transaction taxes at various places around the globe now and have been for a very long time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top