Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-31-2012, 07:27 PM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,481,327 times
Reputation: 7990

Advertisements

Artur Davis: I Should Have Supported Voter ID Law « The Recovering Politician

This is a piece from October of last year, but seems highly relevant right about now. Artur Davis, former US Congressman from Alabama, wrote that:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Artur Davis
I’ve changed my mind on voter ID laws...Without any evidence to back it up, I lapsed into the rhetoric of various partisans and activists who contend that requiring photo identification to vote is a suppression tactic...The truth is that the most aggressive contemporary voter suppression in the African American community, at least in Alabama, is the wholesale manufacture of ballots....Voting the names of the dead, and the nonexistent, and the too-mentally-impaired to function, cancels out the votes of citizens who are exercising their rights — that’s suppression by any light.
In that very last sentence, he sums it up. When ineligible voters are able to participate in elections, the votes of legitimate voters are diluted and thus suppressed. Suppression from either direction--whether efforts to block legit voters from voting, or efforts to enable illegit voters to vote, must be stopped.

The piece is very well written, gives a balanced view of the problem, in contrast to some of the deliberately misleading partisan tripe that we're seeing. It's well worth reading.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-31-2012, 09:58 PM
 
Location: Pensacola, Florida
753 posts, read 850,436 times
Reputation: 485
I guess he did what he thought would get him re-elected instead of what he felt was right. Seems his current party change is another move in that direction.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2012, 10:05 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,812,214 times
Reputation: 7943
Becoming a Republican may have been one of the best decisions he's ever made. His political opinions will carry a lot more clout than they did before.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2012, 10:25 PM
 
Location: Pensacola, Florida
753 posts, read 850,436 times
Reputation: 485
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
Becoming a Republican may have been one of the best decisions he's ever made. His political opinions will carry a lot more clout than they did before.
He has no chance in VA. From Alabama's Black Belt to DC suburbs? Not hardly. He should become a lobbyist.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2012, 10:32 PM
 
33,012 posts, read 27,676,659 times
Reputation: 9074
It is NOT about providing photo identification and I have already proved that.

It's about something else and I'd like supporters to acknowledge that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-01-2012, 05:09 AM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,481,327 times
Reputation: 7990
We're getting a phony and lopsided debate on this, as I showed in post #3 of this thread:
https://www.city-data.com/forum/elect...red-again.html

what good is going to come of a debate where either side is lying, just trying to troll for useful idiots? Actually based on what little I can find out I don't think the decision by the fed judge yesterday about the FL law was bad. IOW, I am willing to consider whether there were really efforts at 'voter suppression' coming from the R side. But as long as there are not more Artur Davis willing to jettison the phony debate and adopt a more honest and balanced approach, we're unlikely to make any real progress.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-01-2012, 05:15 AM
 
1,724 posts, read 1,480,049 times
Reputation: 780
New Mexican Democrats snuffed out the Green Party. Democrats hate choice and competition. Heck, even Democrats over at "Democratic Underground" will still blame Nader for Bush. The last thing progressives want is choice, democracy, and independent thought. They don't like it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top