Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-03-2012, 09:27 PM
 
Location: North America
5,960 posts, read 5,551,516 times
Reputation: 1951

Advertisements

Soros Liberal Front Group Asks FCC to Cancel Fox Television's Licenses | NewsBusters.org

Quote:
They've tried and failed repeatedly to install the so-called "Fairness Doctrine" as a means of using the government to silence conservatives, now a George Soros-connected "ethics" group is taking another route to censorship.

The Hill reports that Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington is asking the Federal Communications to cancel Fox's broadcasting licenses in the United States because of the phone hacking scandal involving a newspaper owned by a sister company utterly separate from it in the United Kingdom.
What is it with these liberals and their Soviet style tactics in trying to silence dissent?

Why are they scared to allow alternative viewpoints to be discussed on an open forum (like Fox News)?

I guess "progressive thought" stops when the subjects get uncomfortable.

Soros and the "Citizens" should be ashamed of themselves for being so cowardly!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-03-2012, 10:27 PM
 
Location: Chesterfield,Virginia
4,919 posts, read 4,841,182 times
Reputation: 2659
Quote:
Originally Posted by clb10 View Post
Soros Liberal Front Group Asks FCC to Cancel Fox Television's Licenses | NewsBusters.org



What is it with these liberals and their Soviet style tactics in trying to silence dissent?

Why are they scared to allow alternative viewpoints to be discussed on an open forum (like Fox News)?

I guess "progressive thought" stops when the subjects get uncomfortable.

Soros and the "Citizens" should be ashamed of themselves for being so cowardly!
No idea why they'd want to silence Fox Snooze after they have turned it into a Bastion of leftist liberalism!?
(snakes nest)

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2012, 10:29 PM
 
20,187 posts, read 23,883,864 times
Reputation: 9284
The liberals don't like it when they have 999 liberal news outlets and there is ONE conservative news outlet... can't you see how unfair it is?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2012, 10:30 PM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,975,057 times
Reputation: 12829
The Narcissist in Chief cannot tolerate criticism. Free speech must be silenced and those who will not bow down to him will be charged as felons.

Don't you just love our dictator?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2012, 10:32 PM
 
3,064 posts, read 2,642,299 times
Reputation: 968
Quote:
Originally Posted by clb10 View Post
Soros Liberal Front Group Asks FCC to Cancel Fox Television's Licenses | NewsBusters.org



What is it with these liberals and their Soviet style tactics in trying to silence dissent?

Why are they scared to allow alternative viewpoints to be discussed on an open forum (like Fox News)?

I guess "progressive thought" stops when the subjects get uncomfortable.

Soros and the "Citizens" should be ashamed of themselves for being so cowardly!
Doubt Soros is capable of feeling shame. It's an emotion that requires a conscience.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2012, 10:43 PM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,975,057 times
Reputation: 12829
Quote:
Originally Posted by doctrain View Post
Doubt Soros is capable of feeling shame. It's an emotion that requires a conscience.
True enough. If Soros didn't have a conscience for playing a role in sending countless Jews to concentration camps I doubt destroying the 1st Amendment means much to him other than another victory to tally up and stuff in his messianic complex.

Why the far left tolerates the destruction of the 1st Amendment just so Obama's Billionaire backer (the top 1% of the 1%) can engage in his personal war against Rupert Murdoch/Roger Ailes, I really cannot fathom.

Think that CISPA is going to allow freedom of speech? Really?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2012, 12:10 AM
 
Location: USA
13,255 posts, read 12,144,119 times
Reputation: 4228
From the article...


"CREW wants the FCC to revoke broadcast licenses for the 27 stations the Fox network owns in the United States. Rupert Murdoch heads News Corp., the parent company of Fox. Murdoch's former newspaper, News of the World, is under investigation in England for allegedly bugging phones in order to obtain stories."

"CREW's letter to the FCC asserts the phone hacking scandal in Great Britain is evidence of a "significant character deficiency" that could disqualify Fox from holding a license in the United States. Because no Fox/News Corp. media companies in the United States have been charged with any criminal wrongdoing or involvement in the phone-hacking scandal, the CREW crew make their argument a personal attack on Rupert Murdoch and his family, saying “the Murdochs clearly do not have the requisite character to retain their broadcast licenses.”

CREW Executive Director Melanie Sloan said in a statement that "if the Murdochs don’t meet the British standards-of-character test, it is hard to see how they can meet the American standard.”

Read more: Soros Liberal Front Group Asks FCC to Cancel Fox Television's Licenses | NewsBusters.org


They say fish rot from the head down.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2012, 12:56 AM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,803 posts, read 41,068,247 times
Reputation: 62204
RedState's Erick Erickson wrote a really good column last week on the second coming of liberal fascism where it's no longer a matter of advancing your own ideas but an attempt to shut down opposing viewpoints:

"Radical activist Van Jones, a former White House “green jobs czar” leads an organization called Color of Change. The organization, Media Matters for America, and others are leading coordinated attacks on businesses that choose to give money to conservative causes, advertise on talk radio, and the like. They say they are boycotting, which is their right to do. Except these are not boycotts to advance rights as in the sixties. These are boycotts to shut down opposing views. When any side typically believes it is right, it often will encourage the other side to speak loudly so everyone can hear the wrongness of their views. Not so now. The left, no doubt unable to win in the battle of ideas, has decided to shut down the battle. Businesses are harassed. In a Fox News interview, one business owner in New York who advertises with Rush Limbaugh told the anchor his business was targeted. Women in his office were called and harassed, spoken to crudely, and threatened."

The Second Coming of American Liberal Fascism? | RedState

We've already seen it at the colleges/universities where they do not let people with opposing viewpoints to speak.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2012, 01:42 AM
 
Location: USA
13,255 posts, read 12,144,119 times
Reputation: 4228
Quote:
Originally Posted by LauraC View Post
RedState's Erick Erickson wrote a really good column last week on the second coming of liberal fascism where it's no longer a matter of advancing your own ideas but an attempt to shut down opposing viewpoints:

"Radical activist Van Jones, a former White House “green jobs czar” leads an organization called Color of Change. The organization, Media Matters for America, and others are leading coordinated attacks on businesses that choose to give money to conservative causes, advertise on talk radio, and the like. They say they are boycotting, which is their right to do. Except these are not boycotts to advance rights as in the sixties. These are boycotts to shut down opposing views. When any side typically believes it is right, it often will encourage the other side to speak loudly so everyone can hear the wrongness of their views. Not so now. The left, no doubt unable to win in the battle of ideas, has decided to shut down the battle. Businesses are harassed. In a Fox News interview, one business owner in New York who advertises with Rush Limbaugh told the anchor his business was targeted. Women in his office were called and harassed, spoken to crudely, and threatened."

The Second Coming of American Liberal Fascism? | RedState

We've already seen it at the colleges/universities where they do not let people with opposing viewpoints to speak.
Kind of like when there was a big push to ban rap back in the 90's. Or how a conservative organization wanted to boycott corporations that displayed openly homosexual ads.

That's not the argument being made in the OP's article at all. If you read the article it states that the claim was raised in response to the wiretapping scandal. Britain has already stated that the Murdoch show is over in their country, some are arguing that his run should be over here in the US as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2012, 02:52 AM
 
7 posts, read 4,855 times
Reputation: 11
It is logical to assume that Fox will not be shut down. I believe it is possible that their format might change towards a more moderate ideology.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top