Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-25-2012, 10:51 PM
 
3,201 posts, read 3,860,559 times
Reputation: 1047

Advertisements

Why does a political party employ "Scientists".

Are you really a "Scientist' if you get paid to say something?

Science is now officially BS.

Marvin Meadors: Why Is the GOP Ignoring Its Own Climate Scientists About Climate Change?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-25-2012, 11:23 PM
 
15,912 posts, read 20,212,133 times
Reputation: 7693
I guess they did it because the progressive liberal left hired all the leftist progressive liberal scientists to advance their agenda leaving only the conservative scientists open for employment....

Good one OP, I love it, another Huff Post leftist biased article
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-25-2012, 11:41 PM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,647 posts, read 26,405,451 times
Reputation: 12657
Quote:
Originally Posted by plwhit View Post
I guess they did it because the progressive liberal left hired all the leftist progressive liberal scientists to advance their agenda leaving only the conservative scientists open for employment....

Good one OP, I love it, another Huff Post leftist biased article

OK, so it's "climate change" now?

Well, if everyone is happy with "climate change", and if we're all done changing official data and conspiring through E-mails to change official data, and if we are finally done running around with hockey stick graphs designed to scare the crap out of people in order to promote a political agenda that was previously DOA, if all that has run its course, maybe someone can explain to me why "climate change" is a bad thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-25-2012, 11:45 PM
 
Location: Pluto's Home Town
9,982 posts, read 13,770,897 times
Reputation: 5691
Well, when China hands us our ass, we can thank all the brilliant folks in the GOP who've decided to replace our pinko scientists with paid bull**** artists.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-25-2012, 11:58 PM
 
4,734 posts, read 4,334,468 times
Reputation: 3235
I think this country is in danger of descending into chaos. We have about half the electorate who doesn't understand how a successful democratic society is supposed to function.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2012, 12:19 AM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,647 posts, read 26,405,451 times
Reputation: 12657
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiddlehead View Post
Well, when China hands us our ass, we can thank all the brilliant folks in the GOP who've decided to replace our pinko scientists with paid bull**** artists.



And for that reason we should subsidize solar panel manufacturing?



...quietly tip-toes out of room without making eye contact....signals to the hospital attendant that one of the patients needs to be restrained....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2012, 12:20 AM
 
Location: Pluto's Home Town
9,982 posts, read 13,770,897 times
Reputation: 5691
To quote Heinrich Cotta, the German Forest scientist:

"Forestry...is based on knowledge of nature. The deeper we penetrate its secrets, the greater the depths before us. What the light of an oil lamp shows is easily missed; many more things can be seen my torch light, but infinitely more in sunlight. The lighter it grows around us the more unknown things become apparent. And it is a sure sign of shallowness if anybody believes he knows it all."

The same can be said of atmospheric and earth system science.

Some people here think they have the knowledge to say what our effect might be, and that they can determine, what is reputable science, based on politics. This is a sure sign of ignorance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2012, 08:59 AM
 
Location: The land where cats rule
10,908 posts, read 9,562,339 times
Reputation: 3602
To the OP:

Are you saying that it is alright for the democrats to hire scientists but not for the republicans?

Rather exposes a bias, does it not?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2012, 09:19 AM
 
Location: NC
1,672 posts, read 1,772,902 times
Reputation: 524
Umm...anyone read the article?

I'm not seeing a direct connection with the thread title and the article.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-26-2012, 09:38 AM
 
13,053 posts, read 12,960,751 times
Reputation: 2618
From the OP's article:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/marvin...b_1307806.html

Quote:
According to a fascinating article by Katherine Bagley prosaically titled "GOP Not Listening to its Own Climate Scientists on Climate Change," a group of prominent conservative scientists, many of them evangelicals, approached conservative politicians to educate them on climate change and predictably the pols have not "warmed," shall we say, to their efforts.
What is amusing about this article is how much they just don't get the point about the science. Notice how the point of the article is that the conservatives aren't accepting alleged conservative scientists conclusions on AGW, and they should, because you know... they are conservative, and religious ones at that! What is wrong with conservatives if they won't appeal to the authority and accept unfounded suppositions from their own political party? Why it is just crazy! /sarcasm

The reason they don't get it is because the entire issue and objection by skeptics is not that of accepting fallacious claims of validity, but that of properly applying scientific process. So, naturally they aren't going to accept such tactics, even from their "own" political parties. /gasp
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top