Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Why? Why do you assume anything here? I have no idea how the course will be implemented, and neither do you. Its just an *elective* course. No reason to feel threatened.
Allowing the Bible to be studied as part of a Western civ. class (or literature, etc.) is one thing. Having just a Bible-related class crosses the constitutional line, imo.
Why? Why do you assume anything here? I have no idea how the course will be implemented, and neither do you. Its just an *elective* course. No reason to feel threatened.
It would have to be, since some notable people interpreted the Bible to be against civil rights and some interpreted it the other way. There are so many contradictions in the Bible, it's going to be one long class and I wouldn't be surprised if it left many students losing faith in the Bible.
What the law will say is one thing. How it is applied may be another. Since I don't trust the people pushing adoption/passage/sigining of this legislation I suspect they will violate the stated intent.
History clearly shows the influence of the bible on western culture so this course seems like a waste of time since public schools are already purportedly teaching history.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.