Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-26-2011, 12:15 PM
 
Location: Vancouver, B.C., Canada
11,155 posts, read 29,330,060 times
Reputation: 5480

Advertisements

KABUL – Afghanistan’s cabinet cleared the way for the war-torn state to sign a deal with China National Petroleum Corp (CNPC) for the development of oil blocks in the Amu Darya basin, the Afghan president’s office said on Monday.
The deal covering drilling and a refinery in the northern provinces of Sar-e Pul and Faryab will be the first international oil production agreement entered into by the Afghan government for several decades.

It marks the second major deal for China in Afghanistan after Metallurgical Corp of China signed a contract in 2008 to develop the huge Aynak copper mine south of Kabul, which is due to start producing by the end of 2014.
“The Afghan cabinet has ordered Mines Minister Wahidullah Shahrani to sign an oil exploration contract for Amu Darya with China National Petroleum Corporation,” the statement said.

Jawad Omar, a spokesman for the mines ministry, said the contract would be signed on Wednesday.

State-owned CNPC and joint venture partner Watan Group — a diversified Afghan company — will explore for oil in three fields in the basin – Kashkari, Bazarkhami and Zamarudsay, which are estimated to hold around 87 million barrels of oil.

Under the contract, CNPC will agree to pay a 15% royalty on oil, a 20% corporate tax and give up to 70% of its profit from the project to the Afghan government.

The mines ministry said in October that the deal was likely to result in government revenues of US$5-billion over the next 10 years.
Indian and Chinese bidders have been front-runners for deals to develop Afghanistan’s vast mineral deposits, which are valued at US $3-trillion, worrying Western firms that have hesitated to invest in the country due to security concerns.

Experts have warned that mining projects in Afghanistan are likely targets for insurgents, that production and transport costs will be high and that sovereign risk is a serious concern.
But China and India, where demand for energy and industrial inputs is booming, are willing to take risks to secure supplies.
https://www.city-data.com/forum/newth...ewthread&f=114
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-26-2011, 12:18 PM
 
3,201 posts, read 3,859,414 times
Reputation: 1047
Afghanistan will always be to volatile for anyone to consider doing business with. They would have to maintain expensive military security.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-26-2011, 12:22 PM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,221,200 times
Reputation: 18824
So!

Last time i remember, they were a sovereign nation. They can make deals with whatever nation they choose.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-26-2011, 12:31 PM
 
Location: West Coast of Europe
25,947 posts, read 24,756,050 times
Reputation: 9728
Quote:
Originally Posted by joebaldknobber View Post
Afghanistan will always be to volatile for anyone to consider doing business with. They would have to maintain expensive military security.
That's because most foreigners go there as enemies. Nobody likes their place to be invaded for whatever reason. But business benefiting locals is a whole different matter... I guess China will succeed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-26-2011, 12:37 PM
 
15,912 posts, read 20,206,697 times
Reputation: 7693
Why shouldn't they sign a deal with China? They know China does not have to worry about tree-huggers, eco-terrorists or greenies like America does...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-26-2011, 12:45 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,519,997 times
Reputation: 27720
Just like in 2008....China rides in and gets the oil.

dated August 2008:
Iraq Signs Oil Deal With China Worth Up to $3 Billion - NYTimes.com
"..the Iraqi government and the China National Petroleum Corporation have signed a contract in Beijing that could be worth up to $3 billion, Iraqi officials said Thursday."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-26-2011, 01:09 PM
 
Location: Democratic Peoples Republic of Redneckistan
11,078 posts, read 15,086,202 times
Reputation: 3937
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Just like in 2008....China rides in and gets the oil.

dated August 2008:
Iraq Signs Oil Deal With China Worth Up to $3 Billion - NYTimes.com
"..the Iraqi government and the China National Petroleum Corporation have signed a contract in Beijing that could be worth up to $3 billion, Iraqi officials said Thursday."
Yep,that's the way it works.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-26-2011, 01:12 PM
 
2,643 posts, read 2,444,495 times
Reputation: 1928
By all means, let china rape their resources and leave a big mess behind. As long as their not doing it here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-26-2011, 01:17 PM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,477,016 times
Reputation: 4799
The Shanghai Cooperation Organization - Council on Foreign Relations

(SCO)--composed of China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan--was formed as a confidence-building mechanism to resolve border disputes. It has risen in stature since then, making headlines in 2005 when it called for Washington to set a timeline for withdrawing from military bases in Central Asia. Over the past few years, the organization's activities have expanded to include increased military cooperation, intelligence sharing, and counterterrorism drills. The SCO has also intensified its focus on Afghanistan, and may play a greater role in international efforts there in the near future. While some experts say the organization has emerged as a powerful anti-U.S. bulwark in Central Asia, others believe frictions between its two largest members, Russia and China, effectively preclude a strong, unified SCO.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-26-2011, 03:15 PM
 
Location: Troy, Alabama
51 posts, read 59,500 times
Reputation: 28
So, we create their current government and currently have troops there and somehow we miss out on a $3 billion opportunity. Unbelievable, I mean lets try to get something out of this war.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top