Is "diversity" automatically our "strength"? (deport, propaganda, vote)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
im not going to spend time looking for something that is obvious already.
The link had tags around it saying . I don't know why it does that, but I just removed them. That was the change I made unless you mean something else.
Okay, whatever, but since he "knows" all about me and my motivations, I guess there is no problem with me assuming that his motivation is not wanting to discuss the topic.
Diversity is not a strength because it makes it more difficult to have a cohesive society and culture. However, it's something we all have to deal with. It's not going away.
In other words, you don't want to address the topic.
The "topic" has been discussed to death on this board, we get it, some here are against diveristy, and there is term for it, something I have ZERO tolerance for in life or on this board, if you had not noticed.
Diversity is not a strength because it makes it more difficult to have a cohesive society and culture. However, it's something we all have to deal with. It's not going away.
You should spread that over your lawn, it will grow like crazy in the spring
The "topic" has been discussed to death on this board, we get it, some here are against diveristy, and there is term for it, something I have ZERO tolerance for in life or on this board, if you had not noticed.
So is there a list of topics that we should not discuss? By your criteria here, the topic of "racism" should not be discussed, since it has been "discussed to death on this board" as you put it. Will you be calling out those who bring up the topic of "racism" as you have here? And if not, why not?
And to clarify, the some here that you claim are against "diversity" are against forced diversity and the crazy and sometimes dangerous policies that come from it. We've explained that to you again and again.
But the judge's ruling was political; he treated people from a minority group, racial and cultural, in a way that people from the majority would not be treated. This is about "diversity" as policy, its about multiculturalism as policy.
Ok, I see where you're coming from. Well, I would agree there. I don't understand the judge's curiously lenient ruling, and I think everyone should face the same rules.
Which society is more peaceful and cohesive? The United States or Japan?
Apples and oranges.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
