Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
As a fellow atheist, the obvious choice would be the candiadate who has shown the fortitude to stand up to nannyism and tell-me-what-to-do-ism. That of course would be Herman Cain.
As a fellow atheist, the obvious choice would be the candiadate who has shown the fortitude to stand up to nannyism and tell-me-what-to-do-ism. That of course would be Herman Cain.
I am also an atheist, and I happen to agree. There are a few true conservatives in the GOP line-up, but only one conservative with actual executive experience - Herman Cain. Everyone else with executive experience in the GOP line-up is definitely not conservative.
I am a Roman Catholic but I don't bring Religion in my political views so pretty much I am a Atheist in my political views. I am also a Republican Party supporter and I know there is some Super Religious people who is running for President like Rick Santorum, Mitt Romney, Michele Bachmann, Herman Cain and Rick Perry.
I am supporting Fred Karger or Ron Paul to be the Candidates for the Republican Party in 2012.
Atheist who would you pick for the 2012 Candidate for the Republican Party?
I think this thread will be an interesting and one of the most interesting threads on City Data Forum has seen.
Lets get talk about it now.
Atheists such as myself, love Ron Paul
because he doesn't carry his religion on his
sleeve, even though he is a religious man
Any man who wants to end wars has got to have
the support of the more religious, you would think....
If I had to pick someone? Huntsman. He had the balls to say the U.S. can't and shouldn't run from science. I respect him for that. It's sad that is something that helped killed his chances, being logical.
If I had to pick someone? Huntsman. He had the balls to say the U.S. can't and shouldn't run from science. I respect him for that. It's sad that is something that helped killed his chances, being logical.
By saying that he meant that he was not against raising taxes on everyone.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
