Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-29-2011, 11:26 AM
 
46,168 posts, read 27,837,919 times
Reputation: 24427

Advertisements

Federal government inflated census figures for same-sex married couples

Quote:
The 2010 census overestimated the number of households with same-sex married couples by more than 160%, the U.S. Census Bureau announced Tuesday.

...
The inconsistency apparently occurred because residents may have checked the wrong box when responding to questions about their relationship to the householder and the sex of each person living there.

...
The 2010 census first reported that there were 349,377 same-sex married-couple households and 552,620 same-sex unmarried-partner households across the country.

On Tuesday officials said they had revised the count to 131,729 same-sex married-couple and 514,735 same-sex unmarried-partner households.
It's always someone else's fault, isn't it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-29-2011, 11:33 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,984,538 times
Reputation: 12341
How exactly does this bode with the accusation of data being deliberately inflated?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2011, 11:39 AM
 
46,168 posts, read 27,837,919 times
Reputation: 24427
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
How exactly does this bode with the accusation of data being deliberately inflated?
The red above was not in the above post.

The census people could have made a mistake - but they always look at others making a mistake first. That's all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2011, 11:40 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,984,538 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
The red above was not in the above post.

The census people could have made a mistake - but they always look at others making a mistake first. That's all.
Why no mention of "mistake" in the title? Usage of "inflated by 160%" points at accusation, not a "misreporting" or "mistake".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2011, 11:48 AM
 
46,168 posts, read 27,837,919 times
Reputation: 24427
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
Why no mention of "mistake" in the title? Usage of "inflated by 160%" points at accusation, not a "misreporting" or "mistake".
Did you see the title of the article? E-mail the author and leave me alone with this nonsense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2011, 11:49 AM
 
13,053 posts, read 13,019,624 times
Reputation: 2618
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
Which is why when they showed to my door, I sent them packing. We already knew they were going to make up whatever they wanted anyway.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2011, 12:37 PM
 
9,848 posts, read 8,329,927 times
Reputation: 3296
No big deal, they just over inflated the number by 40%.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2011, 02:30 PM
 
23,838 posts, read 23,248,959 times
Reputation: 9409
Better to ask for forgiveness than for permission. By putting out the wrong number, the cat was let out of the bag. They know that. The American people only know of the erroneous number, but how many actually know of the substantially revised number? You can't put toothpaste back in the tube. It's part an parcel of the Gay Agenda that infests our country. This is no small mistake.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2011, 02:34 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,452,055 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
Maybe that question was a bit too tough to interpret for many people. Also, we know the movement was hot and heavy then and many of those things could have been purposely filled in wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2011, 02:52 PM
 
2,963 posts, read 6,300,604 times
Reputation: 1578
What is the point of this thread?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:19 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top