Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-31-2011, 11:55 AM
 
3,457 posts, read 3,626,532 times
Reputation: 1544

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Yes you did:
You've refused to acknowledge at least twice that Geithner created TARP with Paulson.
Untrue, I never refused to acknowledge that. The fact that Geithner was involved, does not make him the creator of TARP.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-31-2011, 12:25 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,089 posts, read 44,917,204 times
Reputation: 13727
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cletus Awreetus-Awrightus View Post
Untrue, I never refused to acknowledge that. The fact that Geithner was involved, does not make him the creator of TARP.
Geithner was a primary architect. Do you know what architect means in that context?

architect: the deviser, maker, or creator of anything: the architects of the Constitution of the United States.
Architect | Define Architect at Dictionary.com

Honestly, you're digging yourself into a deeper hole.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2011, 12:27 PM
 
3,457 posts, read 3,626,532 times
Reputation: 1544
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Geithner was a primary architect. Do you know what architect means in that context?
yes, it means someone who assisted Paulson.

Quote:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0908/13609.html

Paulson's rescue plan is called 'TARP'

Get ready to hear a lot about TARP — the "troubled asset relief program" that Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson proposed Friday as a way for the government to take bad mortages off the loans of the nation's financial institutions.

"The federal government must implement a program to remove these illiquid assets that are weighing down our financial institutions and threatening our economy," Paulson said in his statement.
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trouble...Relief_Program

In the original plan presented by Secretary Paulson, the government would buy troubled (toxic) assets in insolvent banks and then sell them at auction to private investor and/or companies. This plan was scratched when Paulson met with United Kingdom's Prime Minister Gordon Brown who came to the White House for an international summit on the global credit crisis.[citation needed] Prime Minister Brown, in an attempt to mitigate the credit squeeze in England, merely infused capital into banks via preferred stock in order to clean up their balance sheets and, in some economists' view, effectively nationalizing many banks. This plan seemed attractive to Secretary Paulson in that it was relatively easier and seemingly boosted lending more quickly. The first half of the asset purchases may not be effective in getting banks to lend again because they were reluctant to risk lending as before with low lending standards. To make matters worse, overnight lending to other banks came to a relative halt because banks did not trust each other to be prudent with their money.

On November 12, 2008, Secretary of the Treasury Henry Paulson indicated that reviving the securitization market for consumer credit would be a new priority in the second allotment.[16][17]

On December 19, 2008, President Bush used his executive authority to declare that TARP funds may be spent on any program that Secretary of Treasury Henry Paulson,[18] deemed necessary to alleviate the financial crisis.

Last edited by Cletus Awreetus-Awrightus; 08-31-2011 at 12:35 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2011, 12:32 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,089 posts, read 44,917,204 times
Reputation: 13727
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cletus Awreetus-Awrightus View Post
yes, it means someone who assisted Paulson.
I can see another vocabulary lesson is necessary.

primary: first or highest in rank or importance; chief; principal
first in order in any series, sequence, etc.
first in time; earliest
Primary | Define Primary at Dictionary.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2011, 12:33 PM
 
3,457 posts, read 3,626,532 times
Reputation: 1544
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
I can see another vocabulary lesson is necessary.

primary: first or highest in rank or importance; chief; principal
first in order in any series, sequence, etc.
first in time; earliest
Primary | Define Primary at Dictionary.com
I'm enjoying watching you squirm, as if the definition of "primary" has any bearing on what took place, as if what actually occured hinges upon the meaning of this one phrase in a wapo article.

I like how I can say something that totally blasts your argument out of the water, and you just ignore it. Your dedication to the Bush administration and the Republican Party is impressive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2011, 12:34 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,089 posts, read 44,917,204 times
Reputation: 13727
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cletus Awreetus-Awrightus View Post
yes, it means someone who assisted Paulson.
No. You're not reading your own links.

For example...
Quote:
In the original plan presented by Secretary Paulson
Paulson presented TARP because he was Treasury Secretary at the time. Paulson and Geithner created it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2011, 12:41 PM
 
3,457 posts, read 3,626,532 times
Reputation: 1544
How TARP Began: An Exclusive Inside View - Rick Newman (usnews.com)

Quote:
TARP's chief architect was Henry "Hank" Paulson
I'm enjoying this. I want to see what acrobatics you come up with next to try and absolve Paulson of responsibility.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2011, 01:00 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,089 posts, read 44,917,204 times
Reputation: 13727
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cletus Awreetus-Awrightus View Post
How TARP Began: An Exclusive Inside View - Rick Newman (usnews.com)



I'm enjoying this. I want to see what acrobatics you come up with next to try and absolve Paulson of responsibility.
I'm not absolving Paulson of anything. The problem here is that you don't seem to understand that Bernanke, Paulson, Geithner, and Obama are all complicit in this together. Why else would Obama immediately appoint Geithner as his Treasury Secretary?

Incidentally, from the Rick Newman article you linked...
Quote:
TARP's chief architect was Henry "Hank" Paulson, President Bush's treasury secretary, who led the financial rescue along with Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and New York Fed Chairman Tim Geithner, who's now Paulson's replacement at treasury. Their initial plan was to use the $700 billion in TARP funding approved by Congress last October to purge financial firms of their so-called toxic assets.
Their. They were all involved in creating TARP, an all out giveaway to the fraud-commiting banksters.

Many were unhappy about Obama nominating Tax Cheat Timmy Geithner, but the dumb*ss Dems and liberals never did anything about it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top