Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The main reason U.S. companies are reluctant to step up hiring is scant demand, rather than uncertainty over government policies, according to a majority of economists in a new Wall Street Journal survey.
I would say this is probaby true. Based largely on the Borders thread. Seems like consumption is just down.
But, I do think companies are more concerned with short term profits than stimulating the economy through hiring. Many (not all, of course) have the money to do so, but they think they can make more elsewhere.
Consumption in the US is down while consumption in emerging nations is on the rise.
That's why the multinationals have such good profits; the profits are coming from other countries.
solution is to tax even more money out of the economy and kill demand even more?
Ah, take money out of the economy? What does the government do with tax dollars rush off to secret buildings filled with mattresses where they stash all that taxed money?
I tend to believe that business people know better why they don't hire, than economists. Of course lack of demand is part of the reason, but increased productivity is happening.
I don't think economists know as much as business owners about what motivates them.
Ah, take money out of the economy? What does the government do with tax dollars rush off to secret buildings filled with mattresses where they stash all that taxed money?
You need to be rflayao...
Supposedly the government pays off its debt with that money.
I tend to believe that business people know better why they don't hire, than economists. Of course lack of demand is part of the reason, but increased productivity is happening.
I don't think economists know as much as business owners about what motivates them.
Ah, since for the most part economist work in the private sector, for investment banks and other financial institutions you apparently assume that economist do not discuss these issues with the businesses that their institutions are charged with investing in. A very wrong assumption on your part.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.