Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
HC: How about you drive to Omaha and see for yourself? While you're at it, you can take pictures of it and prove to the world that there is some amazing cover up.
Until then, you can blow it out your ***.
No thanks... I won't be looking at Omaha real estate anytime soon...
All this fuss over some glow-in-the-dark corn? Some incandescent Orville Redenbacher might be just the thing for this coming Independence Day celebrations.
Why?... cuz I don't want to get iradiated?... Maybe Anne Coulter can take a stroll down by Fort Calhoun...
The reason you lose some credibility, not all credibility, because there's nothing wrong with acknowledging that nuclear power plants can pose a danger, but the reason you lose some credibility is that your sources of information have agendas that make them pre-disposed to overstating the dangers of the situation in Nebraska. The Japanese melt-downs have recalled to the world the Chernobyl disaster, and the Russians have an interest in trying to minimize their mismanagement of that nuclear meltdown by trying to paint the Americans as equally incompetent. The Pakistanis, in light of the Osama bin Laden debacle have an agenda against Americans. And the anti-nuclear power activist has an agenda in ramping up fear against nuclear power. Given that there is zero evidence of a nuclear melt-down or even of any loss of control at the nuclear power plant in question, it simply isn't reasonable to mire oneself down in fear over this.
The reason you lose some credibility, not all credibility, because there's nothing wrong with acknowledging that nuclear power plants can pose a danger, but the reason you lose some credibility is that your sources of information have agendas that make them pre-disposed to overstating the dangers of the situation in Nebraska. The Japanese melt-downs have recalled to the world the Chernobyl disaster, and the Russians have an interest in trying to minimize their mismanagement of that nuclear meltdown by trying to paint the Americans as equally incompetent. The Pakistanis, in light of the Osama bin Laden debacle have an agenda against Americans. And the anti-nuclear power activist has an agenda in ramping up fear against nuclear power. Given that there is zero evidence of a nuclear melt-down or even of any loss of control at the nuclear power plant in question, it simply isn't reasonable to mire oneself down in fear over this.
Then why isn't national mainstream media reporting on the flood disaster?... because then the Nuclear Power plant issue will come up...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
