Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-14-2011, 09:55 AM
 
Location: Barrington, IL area
1,594 posts, read 3,069,572 times
Reputation: 4957

Advertisements

This isn't news. Anyone can go through your trash.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-14-2011, 10:04 AM
 
13,053 posts, read 13,016,732 times
Reputation: 2618
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
oh please

garbage is garbage

many 'civilians' dumpster dive

one mans trash is another mans treasure
Does nothing to state ownership or validate trespass on to private property to obtain such.


Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
the fact is if you threw it out, it is no longer yours and if its at the curb (which is not really your property, but the EDGE of your property,)(in fact it is considered PUBLIC property) its available for ANYONE to take, or go through

that's why they tell you to be careful what you throw out (ie bank statements, etc)
If it is still on my property, it most certainly is. Until I hand it over, it is mine, under my control and my ownership.

If it is off my property as you even note (placed at a curb where it is considered public property), then you are correct. I am aware of the public zone that meets the property line on various properties. In many rural areas this line is often set back 5-10 feet to the property (usually you can tell by looking at utility poles and the like to get a rough idea as to where your private property starts from public.

My point is not about such issues, but when it is on private property. For instance, I keep my can behind a fence near my garage door. This is completely on private property and under my full control. Anything within that can is my property until I place the can at the public portion of my property for pick up. At that point, I have relinquished control over such.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2011, 11:02 AM
 
Location: Long Island
33,112 posts, read 19,744,114 times
Reputation: 9760
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nomander View Post
My point is not about such issues, but when it is on private property. For instance, I keep my can behind a fence near my garage door. This is completely on private property and under my full control. Anything within that can is my property until I place the can at the public portion of my property for pick up. At that point, I have relinquished control over such.
yes if it is actually within your property then no they(or anyone) cant tresspess

but at the curb (or outside the easement) (or what ever the technical terms are) it becomes public property

the other day I threw out a old walk behind lawn mower that the engine was blown..put it at the curb...less than a half an hour it was gone....bucuase I put it out to PUBLIC area for the taking

Last edited by workingclasshero; 06-14-2011 at 12:30 PM.. Reason: fixing my horrible typing
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2011, 11:03 AM
 
25,146 posts, read 54,152,529 times
Reputation: 7059
They've always done it: you just never knew about it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by emilybh View Post
This is alll over the net that the FBI just took the liberty to search through people's trash without a warrant. You can even check their manual at this link The FBI Can Go Through Your Trash Whenever It Wants | NowPublic News Coverage
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2011, 11:36 AM
 
31,384 posts, read 37,267,555 times
Reputation: 15038
Did anyone take the time to read the New York Times story that was the basis for this blog post, apparently not since there is absolutely no mention of garbage cans, trash receptacles or any such. And I know for a fact that no one has taken the time to read California v. Greenwood, 486 U.S. 35 (1988). Reading either would have put a nail in the head of this thread long ago.

So in the attempt to save bandwidth and allow folks to turn their attention to less frivolous topics, the Cliff Notes:
Writing for the majority Justice White;

Held:
1. The Fourth Amendment does not prohibit the warrantless search and seizure of garbage left for collection outside the curtilage of a home. Pp. 486 U. S. 39-44.

(a) Since respondents voluntarily left their trash for collection in an area particularly suited for public inspection, their claimed expectation of privacy in the inculpatory items they discarded was not objectively reasonable. It is common knowledge that plastic garbage bags left along a public street are readily accessible to animals, children, scavengers, snoops, and other members of the public. Moreover, respondents placed their refuse at the curb for the express purpose of conveying it to a third party, the trash collector, who might himself have sorted through it or permitted others, such as the police, to do so. The police cannot reasonably be expected to avert their eyes from evidence of criminal activity that could have been observed by any member of the public. Pp. 486 U. S. 43-44.
Now if you disagree I suspect that the descent of Justices Brennan and Marshall may provide some solace as irrelevant as it once to the final outcome.



I added this quote from the decision because I thought it was funny;

For example, State v. Ronngren, 361 N.W.2d 224 (N. D.1985), involved the search of a garbage bag that a dog, acting "at the behest of no one," id. at 228, had dragged from the defendants' yard into the yard of a neighbor. The neighbor deposited the bag in his own trash can, which he later permitted the police to search. The North Dakota Supreme Court held that the search of the garbage bag did not violate the defendants' Fourth Amendment rights.


...The reasonableness of a search for Fourth Amendment purposes does not depend upon privacy concepts embodied in the law of the particular State in which the search occurred; rather, it turns upon the understanding of society as a whole that certain areas deserve the most scrupulous protection from government invasion. There is no such understanding with respect to garbage left for collection at the side of a public street. Pp. 486 U. S. 43-44.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:26 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top