Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Will Weiner be gone within the next 2 weeks
Yes 25 53.19%
No 16 34.04%
Not sure 6 12.77%
Voters: 47. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-07-2011, 04:14 PM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 14,000,385 times
Reputation: 5661

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sophiasmommy View Post
Sending unsolicited naked pictures of your erect penis is a crime.
That's a stiff assertion. Are you sure it's a crime or are you just saying it is? If you think it is, what's the statute called?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-07-2011, 04:33 PM
 
Location: West Michigan
12,372 posts, read 9,346,717 times
Reputation: 7364
Quote:
Originally Posted by steven_h View Post
I'd prefer not to elect my representatives based on their sexual drive. When the seriousness of holding office is trumped by sexual prowess and poor behaviour, it's time to find someone better.

If we held officials to a higher standard of ethics (as they should) we wouldn't have the problems we have on the scale that we do.
And yet republican Scott Brown was elected to the senate even though he'd posed naked for Playgirl. It would be really hard to come up with a Litmus Test for a candidate's personal sex life and prowess. Where do you start? Where do you end with that vetting process? I really don't think there are any more scandals with our lawmakers today then there was 50 years ago. They just get caught easier now in our high tech world.


Quote:
Sad is the lack of any indignation at all from the extreme left. It's almost like you cheer his actions, that lying is a good thing, and certainly ruining his marriage seems to matter not. Nothing like a pov that requires zero morality whatsoever. If this is progress you need a new PR firm.

The wheels are coming off the progressive agenda and this is just one more BUMP in the road for you guys.
Where are you hearing anyone on the left "cheering his actions"? I've certainly not heard any liberals doing that on TV, the net or with other liberals in my life. We're not condoning what he did. I think he was a damned fool for doing what he did. I'm disappointed and shocked by his behavior. But I also recognize that he is human with human failings just like all the rest of us. He will pay for his conduct, just going through the ethics hearing and the loss of respect he'll experience for years to come. But I don't feel the need to cut him up into little pieces and feed him to the fishes. "Let those without sin throw the first stone" and all. If that is what you call a "lack of indignation from the left" then I stand guilty as charged.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2011, 04:55 PM
 
5,999 posts, read 7,135,398 times
Reputation: 3313
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
That's a stiff assertion. Are you sure it's a crime or are you just saying it is? If you think it is, what's the statute called?

Clever pun. Lemme ask you something, if he had done it the old fashioned way; long trench coat, shoes and black socks, would that be a crime?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2011, 04:58 PM
 
5,999 posts, read 7,135,398 times
Reputation: 3313
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayland Woman View Post
And yet republican Scott Brown was elected to the senate even though he'd posed naked for Playgirl. It would be really hard to come up with a Litmus Test for a candidate's personal sex life and prowess. Where do you start? Where do you end with that vetting process? I really don't think there are any more scandals with our lawmakers today then there was 50 years ago. They just get caught easier now in our high tech world.


Where are you hearing anyone on the left "cheering his actions"? I've certainly not heard any liberals doing that on TV, the net or with other liberals in my life. We're not condoning what he did. I think he was a damned fool for doing what he did. I'm disappointed and shocked by his behavior. But I also recognize that he is human with human failings just like all the rest of us. He will pay for his conduct, just going through the ethics hearing and the loss of respect he'll experience for years to come. But I don't feel the need to cut him up into little pieces and feed him to the fishes. "Let those without sin throw the first stone" and all. If that is what you call a "lack of indignation from the left" then I stand guilty as charged.

Are you intentionally trying to be obtuse? How is Scott Brown posing in Playgirl back in the 70's equivalent to Screech sending unsolicited nude pictures of his johnson at full mast? I's probably respect you more if you were completely transparent and said, "He has a (D) after his name, so he will forever get a free pass."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2011, 05:23 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,335,669 times
Reputation: 3827
I guess Chrissy Matthews caught a little of that Islamic fever, blaming the wife for Weiner's indiscretions.

Equal rights, so long as you're not harming the Party.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2011, 07:18 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,335,669 times
Reputation: 3827
http://www.radaronline.com/sites/rad...atermarked.pdf

Getting better and better
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2011, 07:23 PM
 
Location: Near Manito
20,169 posts, read 24,404,539 times
Reputation: 15291
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
That's a stiff assertion. Are you sure it's a crime or are you just saying it is? If you think it is, what's the statute called?
Erection fraud, of course.

At least that's what it's called here in Japan.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top