Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
DARAA, Syria -- Thousands of Syrians took to the streets Friday demanding reforms and mourning dozens of protesters who were killed during a violent, weeklong crackdown that has brought extraordinary pressure on the country's autocratic regime, activists and witnesses said.
There were no immediate reports of serious violence.
Daraa, the main city of southern Syria's drought-parched agricultural heartland, has become a flashpoint for protests in a country whose leadership stands unafraid of using extreme violence to quash internal unrest. The coming days will be a crucial test of the surge of popular discontent that has unseated autocrats in Tunisia and Egypt and threatens to push several others from power.
Anyone taking bets as to Obama involving the US in a war there as well? I mean, if 3 wars are good, four should be better, right?
I'm trying to remember my history...but I don't recall any time in the past that we have been involved in 3 wars at once.
The Middle Eastern "revolutions" are by design. We are witnessing the implementation of a new war strategy; it's really just one big war with multiple theatres that has been ongoing for at least a decade. The chaos will wipe out any cohesion and hostile (to the West) control within the region. The West will take over in due time to "liberate" the remaining oil resources with minimal "hassle".
The Middle Eastern "revolutions" are by design. We are witnessing a new war strategy; it's really just one big war with multiple theatres that has been ongoing for at least a decade. The chaos will wipe out any cohesion and hostile (to the West) control within the region and the West will take over in due time to "liberate" the remaining oil resources.
ALL OF THIS is because the world sees Bararck Hussein Obama as a WEAK PRESIDENT. They know he will not commit American troops to stop any of these "revolutions". The world was more peaceful under George Bush.
All this uprising in the Middle East is Obama's fault. He showed that the getting "uppity" can result in freedom, even for "Moozlims". Yep, it's Obama's fault!
ALL OF THIS is because the world sees Bararck Hussein Obama as a WEAK PRESIDENT. They know he will not commit American troops to stop any of these "revolutions". The world was more peaceful under George Bush.
Do you blame your used car salesman if your car gets bad gas mileage too?
The world was never peaceful. It probably never will be. We may have large cranial capacities and be (mostly) hairless, but we are still apes nevertheless. Understand that and you'll begin to understand the ebb and flow of world politics.
All this uprising in the Middle East is Obama's fault. He showed that the getting "uppity" can result in freedom, even for "Moozlims". Yep, it's Obama's fault!
It's Bush's fault, actually. Bush gave the Mid East a taste of freedom, 0bama is the captain on a rudderless boat caught in the storm.
ALL OF THIS is because the world sees Bararck Hussein Obama as a WEAK PRESIDENT. They know he will not commit American troops to stop any of these "revolutions". The world was more peaceful under George Bush.
Why commit American troops, if these "revolutions" eerily seem similar to tactics that British intelligence used in the colonial days? I think these "revolutions" are being perpetrated by MI6 (aka SIS) and the CIA. And remember, al-Qaida is a product of the CIA
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.