Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-14-2011, 06:56 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,681,792 times
Reputation: 7943

Advertisements

Quote:
A member of the House Armed Services Committee plans to introduce legislation next week designed to put the brakes on repeal of the military’s ban on openly gay troops.

The measure by Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.) would add the four military service chiefs to the list of those who must sign off on repealing the policy before it can be officially scrapped.
House Republican aims to put brakes on repeal of 'Don't ask, don't tell' - TheHill.com

All I can guess is that he's throwing a bone to his constituents in suburban San Diego, many of whom are probably old, retired military guys. Why else would he attempt this? It's going nowhere.

Last edited by AnUnidentifiedMale; 01-14-2011 at 07:06 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-14-2011, 07:03 PM
 
10,875 posts, read 13,816,616 times
Reputation: 4896
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
House Republican aims to put brakes on repeal of 'Don't ask, don't tell' - TheHill.com

All I can guess is that he's throwing a bone to his constituents in San Diego, many of whom are probably old, retired military guys. Why else would he attempt this? It's going nowhere.
It's the same as the republicans trying to repeal health care, child labor laws, and trying to mandate guns in congress. They are wasting time and tax payer dollars to give a stroke job to their corporate owners and voters.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2011, 07:15 PM
 
45,232 posts, read 26,464,208 times
Reputation: 24994
If that's what his constituency wants.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2011, 07:19 PM
 
Location: North Las Vegas
1,125 posts, read 1,591,595 times
Reputation: 929
Quote:
Originally Posted by TempesT68 View Post
It's the same as the republicans trying to repeal health care, child labor laws, and trying to mandate guns in congress. They are wasting time and tax payer dollars to give a stroke job to their corporate owners and voters.
Because everyone knows that anything designed to stop senseless spending or to make changes to our military that will hurt moral shouldn't be done. Instead they should keep on finding new and useless ways to put our nation further and further in debt, right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2011, 07:54 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,065,499 times
Reputation: 15038
I thought these people were wearing, carrying, studying and reading and otherwise engrossed in the study of the Constitution because obviously they are not if they think that this piece of legislation is anything other than an absurd encroachment upon the separation of powers. The Congress does not have the power to require a subordinate part of the Executive Branch to either endorse or negate a piece of legislation before the Congress effectively usurping the power of the Presidential veto.

You know, this so absurd on so many levels that I can't believe that I am actually trying to respond rationally to the totally irrational.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2011, 08:37 PM
 
1,728 posts, read 4,729,074 times
Reputation: 487
It's probably not what his constituency wants. A minority of his constituency wants it, but he is doing it because that is what he believes is the best policy. This debate is getting really old. The military is streched thin. Gay soldiers don't commit any more sexual crimes than straight soldiers. Let them serve. It's their country too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2011, 08:41 PM
 
Location: Meggett, SC
11,011 posts, read 11,029,970 times
Reputation: 6192
Quote:
Originally Posted by chitown85 View Post
It's probably not what his constituency wants. A minority of his constituency wants it, but he is doing it because that is what he believes is the best policy. This debate is getting really old. The military is streched thin. Gay soldiers don't commit any more sexual crimes than straight soldiers. Let them serve. It's their country too.
Actually military is already at quota and looking at reduction of forces now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2011, 08:42 PM
 
1,728 posts, read 4,729,074 times
Reputation: 487
Doesn't mean they aren't stretched thin. The policy is still ridiculous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2011, 08:44 PM
 
Location: Meggett, SC
11,011 posts, read 11,029,970 times
Reputation: 6192
Quote:
Originally Posted by chitown85 View Post
Doesn't mean they aren't stretched thin. The policy is still ridiculous.
Seriously, what do you mean by stretched thin?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2011, 09:23 AM
 
Location: Gone
25,231 posts, read 16,947,214 times
Reputation: 5932
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
House Republican aims to put brakes on repeal of 'Don't ask, don't tell' - TheHill.com

All I can guess is that he's throwing a bone to his constituents in suburban San Diego, many of whom are probably old, retired military guys. Why else would he attempt this? It's going nowhere.
Looks like he is ready for retirement, stupid pandering such as this is a quick way to be shown the door.
Casper
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top