Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Now that the Obama haters have been embarrassed again maybe somebody could answer a question?
Did the repugs read the part of the Constitution where it says somethng about seperation of church and state?
Did you know YOUR taxes ($175,000.00 !!!!!!!) pay for a Chaplain?
Is that fiscally conservative? ( I guess)
Is it necessary? (NO)
I assume you mean the part where it simply says "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof?" I don't see why the would shy away from that.
I assume you mean the part where it simply says "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof?" I don't see why the would shy away from that.
I guess I just like to repeatedly point out the hypocrisy of the Repugs.
"""""OH we worship the Constitution.
OH TAXES are awful!
OH let's pay $175,000.00 a year for some dude to say a prayer..."""""".
I assume you mean the part where it simply says "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof?" I don't see why the would shy away from that.
What about the part that decreed that blacks would be treated as only 3/5 of a person? I can imagine that some GOP members would give a limb to be able to read that part aloud, especially some of the tea party friendly ones.
So today Congress is reading the Constitution, but where is our POTUS??? If anyone NEEDS to read the Constitution it's him.
So where is he?
If you were truly interested in the President's activities (which you're not-- you're just interesting in finding creative ways to disparage him...) the White House posts his schedule daily at: President's Schedule | The White House
What about the part that decreed that blacks would be treated as only 3/5 of a person?
Actually, that's not what it said. It refers to counting the whole number of free persons and counting 3/5 of all other persons. The total of non-free people were to be counted and 3/5 of that population was to be considered.
Maybe you should Google "Boehner golf" before any of you mention Obama's golfing......
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
