Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-02-2010, 06:55 PM
 
Location: Round Rock, Texas
13,458 posts, read 15,602,874 times
Reputation: 19039

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
The MID for the family you describe would be minimal, maybe $500 a year.
Minimal? We pay at least 10K in interest, and that is what we use to lower our yearly income. It makes a BIG difference.


As an aside, for the record, we put money down and are not in an exotic loan. We purchased a home that was within 2.5 x our income, which is not considered aggressive. So our home is more than 100k....we work and pay all bills. Like I said, we can use all the write offs that we can get.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-02-2010, 07:08 PM
 
Location: Land of debt and Corruption
7,545 posts, read 8,353,021 times
Reputation: 2889
Quote:
Originally Posted by riaelise View Post
Minimal? We pay at least 10K in interest, and that is what we use to lower our yearly income. It makes a BIG difference.


As an aside, for the record, we put money down and are not in an exotic loan. We purchased a home that was within 2.5 x our income, which is not considered aggressive. So our home is more than 100k....we work and pay all bills. Like I said, we can use all the write offs that we can get.
Exactly correct. I live in a very high tax area and despite not having an outrageous mortgage, we've paid over $13,300 this year in property taxes and interest alone. And that's considered quite low for this area.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2010, 07:13 PM
 
Location: Out in the Badlands
10,420 posts, read 10,874,055 times
Reputation: 7801
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
"Brookings Institution senior fellow Alan Mallach stirred the controversy during an October lecture at University of Nevada, Las Vegas, when he supported the commission's plan to reduce, or even eliminate, the tax deduction for homeowners.
He said lower-income households typically aren't able to take advantage of mortgage deductions and end up subsidizing wealthier people who have larger, more expensive homes. It's also a myth that the tax deduction encourages renters to buy homes."



Brookings fellow calls to cut, or kill, mortgage interest tax deduction - Business - ReviewJournal.com
Tax and spend, tax and spend, tax and spend, Ad infinitum. Can they possibly conceive of anything else?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2010, 07:49 PM
 
Location: Inis Fada
16,966 posts, read 34,845,078 times
Reputation: 7725
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatyousay View Post
Give it a rest. It's a deduction available to anyone who has a mortgage, not just wealthy people with expensive mortgages in high ownership locations whatever that means.

I know plenty of "no-so-rich" people that take advantage of the mortgage deduction.

You are more than welcome to join the ranks of home owners who enjoy this deduction. Nobody but yourself is stopping you from staying a renter.
If a landlord loses his mortgage deduction (assuming this is an apartment in a single family house, which is common where I live) I would imagine said landlord is going to find away to make up the lost deduction in the rent?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2010, 06:08 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,399 posts, read 26,450,394 times
Reputation: 15709
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pretzelogik View Post
Tax and spend, tax and spend, tax and spend, Ad infinitum. Can they possibly conceive of anything else?
The Fiscal Commissions proposals that contained both spending cuts and tax reform were defeated. There were some very good proposals from the bi-partisan commission and hopefully some of them will be implemented. Something has to give or we will end up like Greece, the budget needs to be balanced one way or another and it cannot be entirely spending cuts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top