Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The bank of the United States was a bad idea. Lets not go back to that.
The "Bank of the United States" was actually the Bank of England in disguise... That's why it's charter was not renewed... It was shut down for deceptive practices......
Forcing the population to use Rothchild money is fascism.
Libertarians and the Constitution do not approve the use of force for such things.
Hitler was a national socialist.
So nationalizing the banking system is ok, but nationalizing anything else is bad? It seems to me that this is cafeteria Libertarianism, that libertarians will pick and choose for themselves what is ok to NOT be in the private sector and to be federalized .
The "Bank of the United States" was actually the Bank of England in disguise... That's why it's charter was not renewed... It was shut down for deceptive practices......
It was shut down because President Jackson didn't like the head of it.
Lincoln's money... "Greenbacks"... did work... Until the money changers forced the gold standard on the U.S.
"Greenbacks" were backed by lead.
"Lead poisoning occurs when lead builds up in the body, often over a period of months or years. Even small amounts of lead can cause serious health problems. Children under the age of 6 are especially vulnerable to lead poisoning, which can severely affect mental and physical development. At very high levels, lead poisoning can be fatal."
President Andrew Jackson... prevented it's charter renewal because the bank was controlling the availability of U.S. money...
The bank... controlled by the Bank of England was creating recessions by denying the people credit...
Just like Banks are doing now...
But they have good reasoning for not giving credit easily. Prices are dropping in the housing market, so why grant a loan to someone for a house that may lose value next year?
Granted, they made bad business and banking decisions up to now, but as of late they have been doing better.
Normally the government would lower interest rates to increase credit flow, but they are at 0. Which is why they are talking about buying loans from banks, and keeping houses off the market to artificially stimulate the housing market, easing credit.
I disagree with this though. What we have done is made the economic problems smaller, but more drawn out. I'm for letting the bottom fall out, then letting the market grow quicker.
So nationalizing the banking system is ok, but nationalizing anything else is bad? It seems to me that this is cafeteria Libertarianism, that libertarians will pick and choose for themselves what is ok to NOT be in the private sector and to be federalized .
Libertarianism is all about the proper use of force.
If you are being forced into a sex act, the forcer needs to be nationalized.
Locked up, that is!
Institutionalized.
Socialized.
The Federal Reserve should be arrested and detained.
"Lead poisoning occurs when lead builds up in the body, often over a period of months or years. Even small amounts of lead can cause serious health problems. Children under the age of 6 are especially vulnerable to lead poisoning, which can severely affect mental and physical development. At very high levels, lead poisoning can be fatal."
So what are you saying?... Somebody's about to get shot?... Do tell...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It seems to me that this is cafeteria Libertarianism, that libertarians will pick and choose for themselves what is ok to NOT be in the private sector and to be federalized .
