Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-16-2010, 11:59 AM
 
7,871 posts, read 10,157,982 times
Reputation: 3241

Advertisements

So it's not like some giant Islamic beanstalk falafel plant?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-16-2010, 11:59 AM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,162,384 times
Reputation: 8528
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boompa View Post
Apparently the Constitution isn't imprtant to the Right Wing Nuts

Sad, isn't it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2010, 12:04 PM
 
6,484 posts, read 6,635,842 times
Reputation: 1275
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boompa View Post
Apparently the Constitution isn't imprtant to the Right Wing Nuts

What part of the constitution forbids a local gov't from restricting the construction of a religious landmark?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2010, 12:09 PM
 
Location: The Heartland
4,458 posts, read 4,200,422 times
Reputation: 760
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strel View Post
Super-seed?

EDIT: yes, I know what you meant.

The word you are looking for, and not finding, is "supersede."
Remember Strel...you are not perfect.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2010, 12:12 PM
 
7,871 posts, read 10,157,982 times
Reputation: 3241
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvinist View Post
What part of the constitution forbids a local gov't from restricting the construction of a religious landmark?
The Free Exercise clause, depending on who is building it and whether it is on public land.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2010, 12:14 PM
 
7,871 posts, read 10,157,982 times
Reputation: 3241
Quote:
Originally Posted by TRUEGRITT View Post
Remember Strel...you are not perfect.
No, but I will not stand idly by whilst the Queen's English is raped, murdered, folded, spindled and mutilated. I was a writing instructor, once upon a time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2010, 12:14 PM
 
27 posts, read 15,958 times
Reputation: 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvinist View Post
What part of the constitution forbids a local gov't from restricting the construction of a religious landmark?
and could you imagine the outrage if the government took steps to prevent a christian church from being built in the middle of Kansas or California?

Naww, that wouldnt be on the front page of fox news, would it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2010, 12:14 PM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,162,384 times
Reputation: 8528
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvinist View Post
What part of the constitution forbids a local gov't from restricting the construction of a religious landmark?

If the Govt' forbids it based upon the religion, then **BINGO** unconstitutional.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2010, 12:16 PM
 
Location: The Heartland
4,458 posts, read 4,200,422 times
Reputation: 760
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strel View Post
No, but I will not stand idly by whilst the Queen's English is raped, murdered, folded, spindled and mutilated. I was a writing instructor, once upon a time.
Not everyone has your writing skill and you know you are capable of mistakes as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2010, 12:18 PM
 
29,980 posts, read 43,054,706 times
Reputation: 12829
Quote:
Originally Posted by carterstamp View Post
The first amendment to the US Constitution states:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

So, this only applies to Christians?

Statements like yours are why I am truly concerned for this country.
You seem to be the one who brought up Christians. Please, where has Congress attempted to make any law prohibiting the free exercies of religion? link?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top