Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Philadelphia
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-16-2012, 11:06 AM
 
735 posts, read 1,130,458 times
Reputation: 291

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarketStEl View Post
DVARP, as the article noted, has taken no official position on the proposal - but his quote about 30th Street Station IS accurate, though Grand Central Terminal devotees might quarrel about the "best station in America" part. It is very well designed, though.

From an urban redevelopment standpoint, I agree that the tunnel proposal is better, especially as it creates two rail hubs in the city center, as you point out. But - as you also allude to - its price tag is huge. Now, maybe we should swing for the fences in the hopes that we end up hitting a double, but he's not the only knowledgable rail advocate who has said "let's see if we can't push for something that's more likely to get built." Never mind party - rail skeptics abound in this country, even here where it is actually an important part of the transportation mix.

Also: 30th Street, unlike Grand Central now, would still have intercity service under Amtrak's proposal. Only the express HSR trains would stop at Market East. The slower regional services (which would be akin to today's Acelas and Northeast Regionals) would continue to call on 30th Street.

Edited to add: On further reflection, there is also a transportation argument for the tunnel - the need to add capacity. Amtrak Northeast Corridor trains, high speed and almost high speed, are running full or close to it as it is now, even at the fares they currently charge, which have pretty much driven casual leisure travelers of modest means off the rails. The railroad can add capacity now by running longer trains more frequently, but by 2050, even that won't be an option, and this plan is aimed to meet travel needs that far out.
I love 30th street a lot; I really do. The thing is though that it's too small to be what a rail hub of a major city needs to be, and expanding it would ruin what it is.

As for cost... considering that this isn't going to finished until 2040, why half-ass it? We have a chance to have the best of both worlds and a chance and the hindsight to have the good of NY's Penn Station without the bad, in a place that should be the center of Philadelphia.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kidphilly View Post
Oddly on 1060 AM this morning there was a blurb that construction is starting and the tenant in Penn Presbeterian and some research JV (could have the details a little off as was on the phone with it in the background) is already in place.
Great to hear!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-16-2012, 03:00 PM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,951,203 times
Reputation: 7976
The 178,000 sqft abandoned Umbrella Factory located on the corner of 5th St. and Master St. in Olde Kensington will soon be converted into 142 residential loft style condominiums and 2 commercial spaces. The units will also be suitable for conversion to assisted-living, student housing, or subsidized/artist housing.


Philly Shark: Umbrella Factory
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2012, 08:01 AM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,951,203 times
Reputation: 7976
3737 Market St. parking lot to sprout labs, Petri dishes and 11-story tower | Philadelphia Real Estate Blog
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2012, 08:23 AM
 
Location: West Cedar Park, Philadelphia
1,225 posts, read 2,568,434 times
Reputation: 693
Convention Center moves toward privatized management

I love this thread. This is our good news thread.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2012, 08:26 AM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,951,203 times
Reputation: 7976
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marius Pontmercy View Post
Convention Center moves toward privatized management

I love this thread. This is our good news thread.

It is in many ways. 2035 will be a different time and seeing even all these little things will have a tangible difference in the long run. Imagine Philly 2010 back in 1985 and how things changed in those 25 years.

On your lnk, maybe the costs can come down and less union price drvers making conventions over priced relative to the market.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2012, 10:16 AM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,951,203 times
Reputation: 7976
COUNTDOWN TO THE CODE: Commercial Mixed Use – CMX 2.5 | Philadelphia Planeto


Ask and you shall receive – a handy zoning drawing!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2012, 11:37 AM
 
88 posts, read 111,395 times
Reputation: 132
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwillyfromphilly View Post
Why is Santa Monica, Ca being compared to Center City in the first place.
Center City should be able to destroy Santa Monica when it comes to mass transit. What an odd comparison to make.
It started when I mentioned how Santa Monica was destroyed by overdevelopment, in response to someone here complaining about the city choosing to preserve open space in center city instead of cluttering up every square inch with high rise parking lots and office buildings.

And why is it odd? Santa Monica has a population equal to center city's, and is a bustling metropolitan area that relies heavily on tourism and nightlife for revenue, much like CC.

The entire state of California was ruined by overdevelopment and poor planning. But apparently some people prefer a Blade Runner type future where the streets are like sardine cans and you need a gas mask to walk ten blocks. Meanwhile warehouses are crumbling in neighborhoods that are ripe for redevelopment, if only the developers had a little foresight and imagination. Development that would actually revitalize the city, not tax the aging infrastructure of center city.

But go ahead and build build build. Keep building skyscrapers on every inch of open land in CC until the narrow streets are dark all day long and the roads leading into CC are just crawling parking lots.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2012, 12:03 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA
8,701 posts, read 14,706,631 times
Reputation: 3668
The Philadelphia Planning Commission is having their first meeting Tuesday since Summer Recess and the agenda mentions a "proposed 1,458-unit development in four high-rise structures in the Central Delaware Riverfront Overlay District" at 400 Christopher Columbus Blvd. Has anyone heard of this proposal? It seems there is yet another residential complex proposed for the waterfront just two blocks north of Marina View

Events | PlanPhilly: Planning Philadelphia's Future
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2012, 01:36 PM
 
Location: West Cedar Park, Philadelphia
1,225 posts, read 2,568,434 times
Reputation: 693
Quote:
Originally Posted by Summersm343 View Post
The Philadelphia Planning Commission is having their first meeting Tuesday since Summer Recess and the agenda mentions a "proposed 1,458-unit development in four high-rise structures in the Central Delaware Riverfront Overlay District" at 400 Christopher Columbus Blvd. Has anyone heard of this proposal? It seems there is yet another residential complex proposed for the waterfront just two blocks north of Marina View

Events | PlanPhilly: Planning Philadelphia's Future
There have been tons of proposals to build on the waterfront over the years. I'm not surprised that at any given time a few of them are actually still considered active proposals. Of those maybe one or two will actually get built.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2012, 01:39 PM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,951,203 times
Reputation: 7976
Quote:
Originally Posted by Summersm343 View Post
The Philadelphia Planning Commission is having their first meeting Tuesday since Summer Recess and the agenda mentions a "proposed 1,458-unit development in four high-rise structures in the Central Delaware Riverfront Overlay District" at 400 Christopher Columbus Blvd. Has anyone heard of this proposal? It seems there is yet another residential complex proposed for the waterfront just two blocks north of Marina View

Events | PlanPhilly: Planning Philadelphia's Future
Think your link was broke

try this

Philadelphia Planning Commission meeting, August 21 - includes agenda | PlanPhilly: Planning Philadelphia's Future

400 North Christopher Columbus Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA - Google Maps

Based on the Map this will be right next to the other approved tower next to the Ben Now with potentially 1400 more units some growun retail and good street facing makes more sense
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Philadelphia

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top