Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Non-Romantic Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-08-2014, 04:22 PM
 
4,749 posts, read 4,328,402 times
Reputation: 4970

Advertisements

I enjoy explaining my position on something just like the next person. Obviously, we think our point of view is better or more correct than the other persons.

I tend to ignore anyone who calls me a name whenever debating online. And when they wonder why I don't respond, I let them know that I don't feel like I should continue defending my position because they were rude and called me a name.


Where do you stand on this matter? Would you continue debating?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-08-2014, 05:10 PM
 
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
16,960 posts, read 17,367,580 times
Reputation: 30258
Nope, don't care what other people think about my opinion, nor do I lose sleep over it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2014, 05:52 PM
 
4,787 posts, read 11,777,180 times
Reputation: 12760
I agree with you Pinkmani. People call others names when they have no intelligent response. Reasonably intelligent people consider someone's response, either agree with it or disagree or are neutral. If they disagree then they consider what factual statements they can use to counter the other person's ideas.

That's a debate. If they best someone can up with is " you're a potato head ", then the debate is over.
That's what kindergartners say. I'm an adult- I don't deal with childish behavior from adults.

I don't get upset about it. It's anonymous people on the internet. If I'm secure in what I believe, and no one has come with a good argument to make me change my mind, then I just wander away if conversation gets rude. It's not a big deal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2014, 06:07 PM
 
Location: WA
1,444 posts, read 1,942,921 times
Reputation: 1517
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinkmani View Post
I enjoy explaining my position on something just like the next person. Obviously, we think our point of view is better or more correct than the other persons.

I tend to ignore anyone who calls me a name whenever debating online. And when they wonder why I don't respond, I let them know that I don't feel like I should continue defending my position because they were rude and called me a name.


Where do you stand on this matter? Would you continue debating?
As far as CityData goes, the forums are moderated stringently enough that name-calling is much less tolerable/prevalent than I've seen and experienced on other forums and message boards.

But it hasn't really bothered me when I've encountered it elsewhere (and it shouldn't, because I've engaged in various acts of name-calling myself, to be honest). While some people may disagree with this to some extent, it must be stressed that anonymous communications via the interwebs offer a means through which people are comfortable to elaborate their convictions in ways that, compared to how they may be inclined to behave in face-to-face situations, are less inhibited--opinions aren't always cloaked in social niceties. I can't help it--I rather enjoy this.

So yes, to answer your question, I would--and usually do--continue a debate when such hostilities arise. I may or may not reciprocate name-calling if it's initiated by the "opponent", but either way, I like to marvel at how quickly, and sometimes fiercely, two faceless strangers can establish what objectively appears to be a mutual hatred over this or that disagreement. You may not know each other, but you know that someone, somewhere, holds this or that opinion (even if you know it to be part of a mainstream) that you may happen to find unforgivably reprehensible in the absence of their physical presence.

And then this person calls you a ******* idiot (or whatever).

Now it's on...or maybe it won't be, depending on your temperament and how well you care to maintain it in communications such as these.

This may become more long-winded than I'd like, so I'll leave it at that for now. I'm actually interested to see other peoples' thoughts on this, too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2014, 06:11 PM
 
Location: Corona the I.E.
10,137 posts, read 17,501,951 times
Reputation: 9140
It depends on a few factors. Normally when I see things get heated I will refrain or agree to disagree. I may engage if I see blatant trolling that needs a reprimand. When I see something really rude/obnoxious I may choose to respond.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2014, 09:14 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles area
14,016 posts, read 20,926,886 times
Reputation: 32530
Discussions similar to this one surface from time to time in the "About the Forum" forum. The official City-Data policy that we posters are supposed to follow is to report personal attacks rather than responding to them. That way there is less for a moderator to clean up and huge flame wars are avoided.

What I find interesting is the different levels of sensitivity exhibited by different posters. Some people need to grow a thicker skin so they don't come unglued when the debate gets vigorous, as if we are all supposed to talk like kindergarten teachers. But on the other hand there really are trolls out there who love to provoke and rebuttals just "feed" them.

I have observed a few posters who are so outraged by having suffered attacks by "trolls" that their hyperbolic language becomes troll-like itself, and they launch into bitter critiques of the alleged lack of moderation. Very ironic.

By contrast, the OP of this thread is a model of rationality and serenity. May the subsequent discussion follow that model! LOL
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2014, 09:45 PM
 
Location: North of Canada, but not the Arctic
21,175 posts, read 19,786,513 times
Reputation: 25738
When someone I'm debating resorts to name-calling, I just assume that I won the argument. Then I continue to try to be as polite to them as possible...just to make them look even more like an idiot.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2014, 09:07 AM
 
11,558 posts, read 12,069,197 times
Reputation: 17758
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinkmani View Post
I enjoy explaining my position on something just like the next person. Obviously, we think our point of view is better or more correct than the other persons.

I tend to ignore anyone who calls me a name whenever debating online. And when they wonder why I don't respond, I let them know that I don't feel like I should continue defending my position because they were rude and called me a name.

Where do you stand on this matter? Would you continue debating?
This is typical behavior on most online forums mainly because they aren't slamming you face to face and feel safe in writing whatever they please. If/when anyone replies to any of my postings in a rude manner, I just consider the source, ignore and move on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2014, 04:14 PM
 
181 posts, read 218,567 times
Reputation: 180
Quote:
Originally Posted by Retroit View Post
When someone I'm debating resorts to name-calling, I just assume that I won the argument.
You did.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2014, 05:15 PM
 
Location: Cape Coma Florida
1,369 posts, read 2,277,186 times
Reputation: 2945
When a thread degenerates to that level I'm done with it. I have better things to do with my time and bandwidth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Non-Romantic Relationships
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top