Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-17-2007, 12:39 PM
 
4 posts, read 23,709 times
Reputation: 11

Advertisements

I am located in NJ, the home we are buying is in the catskills. we are relocating so do not know anyone there. We have received reccomendation from our realtor to hire her atty that they use do do our closing.

Our mortgage broker has reccomended the banks atty because they are "more efficient" and dont drag their feet as much as the attorny reccomended by my realtor. (they have dealt with her before and she holds of any title work until all mortgage commitments and appraisals are completed...making it hard to close in time.)...

should I attempt to find my own atty or just use the banks???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-17-2007, 08:57 PM
 
Location: Somerset, NJ
505 posts, read 2,335,200 times
Reputation: 135
Quote:
Originally Posted by aprilm2828 View Post
I am located in NJ, the home we are buying is in the catskills. we are relocating so do not know anyone there. We have received reccomendation from our realtor to hire her atty that they use do do our closing.

Our mortgage broker has reccomended the banks atty because they are "more efficient" and dont drag their feet as much as the attorny reccomended by my realtor. (they have dealt with her before and she holds of any title work until all mortgage commitments and appraisals are completed...making it hard to close in time.)...

should I attempt to find my own atty or just use the banks???
My honest advise is to use the attorney the Realtor is recommending and here is my reasoning:

1. The bank attorney representing you can be scary--they are also representing the bank, who is in escence selling you a mortgage...would you use the seller's attorney? I think not.

2. Since you don't know an atty in the area, you will have to resort to picking one out of the phone book--would you pick a heart surgeon out of the phone book or would you rather take your primary care physicians word for a good doctor?

3. The Realtor does not have atty representation in a sale in NY, therefore the "Realtor's Atty" is actually YOUR atty.

4. If the atty is someone the Realtor refers business to, it's because the atty is someone they have in the past used and trusts and has had a good experience with.

I personally refer all my business to 1 or 2 attorneys because I know what to expect from each of them. I know how well they represent their clients, and I know that they won't make a mountain out of a mole hill.

I hope this answered your question, if not let me know and I'll try to clarify.

~Joey
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2007, 07:30 AM
 
201 posts, read 968,225 times
Reputation: 111
I'm a little confused...you will need your own attorney and you will need a bank attorney...Every lender in NY uses a bank atty that represents them, not you...Usually you don't pick the bank attorney (I mean, you can give your broker suggestions or take his suggestions b/c you close at the bank atty's office so closer to you is better)...just your own...

I would absolutely use any bank atty that the broker suggests...they really don't have a "huge" role...they don't determine what the rules are...the bank does...They just give you the docs and prepare the HUD, etc...

and as for your own attorney I would use the one the realtor suggested since they have confidence in them...It's no biggie

Signed, MMM, the bank attorney
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2007, 09:31 AM
 
Location: Eastern NY
136 posts, read 778,311 times
Reputation: 58
I recently bought a 2nd place in the Catskills, and used the attorney recommended by my buyer's agent. The advantage of this is that they're both in the same city, and "talk to each other every day". When some questions regarding the sale came up, the two of them could exchange papers, calls, talk to the listing agent, etc. without me even getting involved. I only found out afterward.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2007, 10:22 AM
Status: "Let this year be over..." (set 17 days ago)
 
Location: Where my bills arrive
19,219 posts, read 17,078,565 times
Reputation: 15537
Here in Richmond Va we use a closing company no attorneys required unless you want one, it saves alot of money. In the past we have needed an attorney and in both cases us and the buyer used the same attorney. If the transaction is going smoothly why add on more expense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2007, 10:42 AM
 
4 posts, read 23,709 times
Reputation: 11
the realtor is "dual" so we are carefully protecting our interests as well as the sellers. It seems each person...inspector..attorney...mortgage lender..she has reccomended to date are ALL quoting us higher rates than most in the area.

Money not being the only concern of course, but the few hundred here and there start to add up after a while.

the concern I had with her atty was that she has been known to hold off on ANY title work until AFTER appraisal and commitment letter from bank which may hold up our closing a couple weeks costing us more money...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2007, 01:26 PM
 
Location: Somerset, NJ
505 posts, read 2,335,200 times
Reputation: 135
Quote:
Originally Posted by VA Yankee View Post
Here in Richmond Va we use a closing company no attorneys required unless you want one, it saves alot of money. In the past we have needed an attorney and in both cases us and the buyer used the same attorney. If the transaction is going smoothly why add on more expense.
Unfortunately this is actually one of the reasons NY has the highest closing costs in the country....but in this part of NY (south of and including the Catskills) a Realtor can not draw up a legal and binding contract.

The reason is because the County Bar Association's (correct me if I'm wrong on this state/county) refuse to draft up a generic contract for us to use, therefore rendering anything we draw up will not be legal or binding....everyone wants their hand in the pot!

Hope that helps!

~Joey
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2007, 02:23 PM
 
Location: Eastern NY
136 posts, read 778,311 times
Reputation: 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by joeymarine View Post
Unfortunately this is actually one of the reasons NY has the highest closing costs in the country....but in this part of NY (south of and including the Catskills) a Realtor can not draw up a legal and binding contract.

The reason is because the County Bar Association's (correct me if I'm wrong on this state/county) refuse to draft up a generic contract for us to use, therefore rendering anything we draw up will not be legal or binding....everyone wants their hand in the pot!

Hope that helps!

~Joey
It looks like the Otsego/Delaware board of realtors has a standard fill-in-the-blanks purchase agreement form. That's what we used to make the offers and counteroffers, etc. I don't think the attorneys themselves ever drew up a formal sales contract taht I signed, although the seller's attorney changed some paragraph regarding the form of deed right before the final agreement was signed. The attorneys were there at the closing table, with lots of other paperwork to sign (mostly for the seller).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2007, 02:49 PM
 
Location: Somerset, NJ
505 posts, read 2,335,200 times
Reputation: 135
Quote:
Originally Posted by ss58yy View Post
It looks like the Otsego/Delaware board of realtors has a standard fill-in-the-blanks purchase agreement form. That's what we used to make the offers and counteroffers, etc. I don't think the attorneys themselves ever drew up a formal sales contract taht I signed, although the seller's attorney changed some paragraph regarding the form of deed right before the final agreement was signed. The attorneys were there at the closing table, with lots of other paperwork to sign (mostly for the seller).
That may actually be the cut off point to where the BAR association has made a generic contract. We have a "binder" but it is neither legal NOR binding.

It's a very good chance that is the cut-off there, I don't go that far north.

~Joey
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2007, 04:50 PM
 
Location: phoenix, az
648 posts, read 3,089,552 times
Reputation: 367
i'll be buying property in upstate ny coming from az. in az when i bought my house i closed with a title company and the lender. from what i've read here it looks like it's a requirement to have an attorney in on the closing in ny. is this correct??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top