Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > New York City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Do you believe that New York City should fund subway expansion into Staten Island?
Yes, New York City should fund subway expansion into Staten Island 36 63.16%
No, New York City should not fund subway expansion into Staten Island 21 36.84%
Voters: 57. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-25-2010, 08:37 AM
 
Location: Brooklyn
40,050 posts, read 34,613,990 times
Reputation: 10616

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by NYChistorygal View Post
I thought that the bridge was originally supposed to have the subway run on it. Why the idea was trashed, I'll never understand. It would make it easier for people to at least travel between SI and Bklyn, and provide an alternate route to Manhattan.
Absolutely right. For that matter, the Throgs Neck Bridge between The Bronx and Queens was also designed to carry a transit line. Neither has one because (yeah, we've gotta dredge up his name) Robert Moses was a dedicated opponent of mass transit. In fact, I believe he once made a public statement that there would never be a transit line running across those bridges.

As to the other issue brought up--that a line running from Bay Ridge into Staten Island would have to be an express...let's worry about that if it happens! Safe to say, it would have to be. But it's a moot point at present.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-02-2010, 02:20 AM
 
Location: On the Rails in Northern NJ
12,380 posts, read 26,861,461 times
Reputation: 4581
Interesting Map & Article by the Transport Politic , i believe we should push for this plan. The Orange line line would eventually hook up into the planned Elizabeth Light Rail Network.



Staten Island's Business Group Sees Light Rail Ahead « The Transport Politic
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2010, 06:05 AM
 
Location: Brooklyn
40,050 posts, read 34,613,990 times
Reputation: 10616
That's an interesting plan, but one thing you can count on not happening (read: NEVER) is any part of MTA's system crossing a border into New Jersey. Why? Politics...and economics.

If the system crossed a state line, it would then fall under the legal definition of a railroad. As it currently exists, the subways in New York City are defined legally as an urban transit system--but not a railroad. If that was to change, then all of MTA's employees would have to be paid according to Federal scale.

That is one thing MTA will not allow to happen. You can, literally, take that to the bank.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2010, 12:50 PM
 
1,014 posts, read 2,889,259 times
Reputation: 285
This would be a fantastic idea. We need to look no further than how successful the the Hudson-Bergen Light Rail has been to see that our area can use and will embrace innovative, new commuter rail.

Making more of Staten Island commutable to the 2.1 million jobs that exist in manhattan goes a long way toward reducing housing prices throughout the metropolitan area.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2010, 01:11 PM
 
1,016 posts, read 1,939,395 times
Reputation: 171
I have never been on that ferry but SI needs a subway..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2010, 01:15 PM
 
1,786 posts, read 3,462,715 times
Reputation: 3099
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chichappens View Post
I have never been on that ferry but SI needs a subway..
I agree! Not only for visiting friends over there - but because they have some fantastic parks/outdoor areas.

I won't hold my breath though. With all the problems the MTA has in managing their budget, I cannot see this expansion happening in my lifetime. I think we'll see flying cars before we see a subway over to SI!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2010, 01:37 PM
 
1,016 posts, read 1,939,395 times
Reputation: 171
It will also improve tourism...Most people who visit NY never visit SI and many Natives have never been or just drove through SI... Some beautiful mansions in SI that were once homes to very wealthy NY'ers and Celebrities back in the day. and I hear there are some wonderful restaurants as well ....Now i understand why many SI landers want to be seperate state or county.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2010, 01:50 PM
 
Location: On the Rails in Northern NJ
12,380 posts, read 26,861,461 times
Reputation: 4581
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred314X View Post
That's an interesting plan, but one thing you can count on not happening (read: NEVER) is any part of MTA's system crossing a border into New Jersey. Why? Politics...and economics.

If the system crossed a state line, it would then fall under the legal definition of a railroad. As it currently exists, the subways in New York City are defined legally as an urban transit system--but not a railroad. If that was to change, then all of MTA's employees would have to be paid according to Federal scale.

That is one thing MTA will not allow to happen. You can, literally, take that to the bank.
True , but once the economy rebounds i think we will see a push for more rail on SI. I mean the SI Expressway and 440 are turning into 24/7 traffic jams , gas is going up.....The PA would operate the lines that cross into Jersey form NYC. Once the New Bayonne Bridge gets constructed , the first LRT will be built into SI.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gradstudent77 View Post
This would be a fantastic idea. We need to look no further than how successful the the Hudson-Bergen Light Rail has been to see that our area can use and will embrace innovative, new commuter rail.

Making more of Staten Island commutable to the 2.1 million jobs that exist in manhattan goes a long way toward reducing housing prices throughout the metropolitan area.
Wait intill we build the Union-Elizabeth-Newark-Essex-Paterson-Bergen Network , then you'll really see how good LRT is. The New Terminal for the HBLR opens in a few weeks 8th street in Bayonne. SI will defiantly get LRT sometime this decade , its just a matter on how fast it will be constructed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chichappens View Post
I have never been on that ferry but SI needs a subway..
A Subway will never happen , it might cost as much as 400 million$$$ per mile for the Tunnel sections.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cokatie View Post
I agree! Not only for visiting friends over there - but because they have some fantastic parks/outdoor areas.

I won't hold my breath though. With all the problems the MTA has in managing their budget, I cannot see this expansion happening in my lifetime. I think we'll see flying cars before we see a subway over to SI!
LOL, indeed....the MTA will take the cheaper way out via LRT then the expensive Rapid Transit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2011, 07:26 AM
 
1 posts, read 3,578 times
Reputation: 10
The level of misinformation here is astounding. The Verrazano Bridge was never designed to have a subway line because Moses was utterly opposed to mass transit. TA did express a passing interest in a subway line over the bridge, but settled for a bus line as the bridge design shut trains out. There were three efforts to connect the NYC Subway to SI. The first was a combined effort by the Baltimore and Ohio railroad (who ran the SI Rapid Transit system) and the old BMT Company to build a bridge then a tunnel connecting the Fourth Avenue subway in Brooklyn to the SIRT in Tompkinsville. BMT even planned out lines and the city secured property across the North Shore and B&O ordered its new electric cars (in the early 1900s) to be identical in size and configuration to BMT cars. Mayor Hylan reportedly killed this idea. The second plan was a Board of Transportation plan to extend the Brooklyn IND line from Church Avenue and Fort Hamilton Pkwy to Staten Island via Fort Hamilton Pkwy, 86th Street and a Narrows tunnel to a terminal at Westervelt and Hamilton in New Brighton and a southern leg somewhere in Rosebank. Shafts for this line were actually dug in Tompkinsville and Bay Ridge (one can still be found covered by a concrete cap along the Belt Parkway). This extension was considered so certain that a SI Advance in 1940s featured a banner headline heralding the imminent new line. Post-WWII economics and Moses killed this. The third and most vaporous was a vague proposal by MTA in 1968 to include a lower Manhattan extension of the Second Avenue line through NY Harbor to Staten Island in its Phase Two master plan for transportation expansion (1982 and beyond) in NYC. MTA has since dropped any consideration for a subway to SI. Any expansion of the subway through New Jersey would be cinch. There's no physical reason the HBLR couldn't continue in or through SI to Elizabeth and Linden, for example. Even a tunnel probably could be built extending the Fourth Avenue (R) line from 59th Street (95th is too shallow) to SI to a terminal under the I278 at Targee Street with a multi-story park-and-lock like Quincy Adams in Boston, a transfer to bus lines and SIR, but the political will if not the money simply isn't there. Something will be built someday as the ferry and fragmented transportation to and from SI simply won't work without strangling the economic development of SI and NYC.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2011, 11:01 AM
 
Location: Port Richmond, Staten Island, New York City, New York, 10302
317 posts, read 961,129 times
Reputation: 166
I've lived on Staten Island for 22 years and haven't heard as much as a whisper against connecting the island to the rest of the city via train.

Maybe in the 70's and 80's people were afraid, but in 2011 I'd be shocked if such a plan wasn't overwhelmingly embraced.

Not that it'll ever happen though. Ever.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > New York City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top