Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > New York City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-17-2009, 10:45 AM
 
Location: NYC
304 posts, read 1,304,289 times
Reputation: 212

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lou82 View Post
I just got nailed for an illegal cellar apt, the inspector wrote on the report that it was a hazardous apt because of the means of egress.There are 2 additional exits out of the apartment, a door that leads to an enclosed court and a door that leads to the back yard. You cant get to the street from the back yard or court (its a mutliple dwelling block) but in my other 4 legal apts if the main door out of those apts were to be blocked by a fire my tenants would have to jump out of windows(and in two of the apts the windows lead to teh back yard so they too cant get to the street). This is "sufficient" to the city, but a door leading directly to the back yard is not.
...
Now I am not saying my apt should be legal. I understand the ceiling height/air/ventilation issues, but the egress thing baffles me. Maybe it has something to do with making it more difficult for the FDNY having to do a rescue.
Not just "rescue" -- "escape."
If those two doors were blocked by debris, or if conditions above (and available space below) prevented easy ground approach, those tenants (a) couldn't get out at all, or (b) might not be rescued in time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-18-2009, 07:57 AM
 
Location: Home
1,482 posts, read 3,126,817 times
Reputation: 624
You think of it it two ways, risk to tenants and risk to fire/rescue.

You do not want Firemen to have a choice like that, you want to make sure THEY have a way to get in and out with the proper equipment if they can.

But also, when a slumlord CAN go cheaper, they will. They will try to get the most for the least, and when someone is desperate for cheap living, they will not flinch at less accomodating for about the same price (I do not see them "House Hunting").

One other reason is kind of tricky, and may depend more on how a house/apartment is defined by the city. But I know a lot of apartments and rented rooms are not really "official" declared rooms. They are that extra bedroom being rented to help pay the mortgage, or a converted basement being given over to a college student. I do not think that many of these are official in any sense to avoid additional requirements like a house-wide fire alarm system, possible sprinklers, means of egress, and most importantly, taxes.

Saying that an apartment needs access to the street may also define it as an official domicile/unit by the tax code. It may be a technicality, but I would not be surprised if this WAS a reason...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2009, 04:59 PM
 
1,014 posts, read 2,888,779 times
Reputation: 285
Beyond the safety issues, the city has an interest in controlling how many housing units it contains and where those units are. If everyone who could physically create an extra unit was actually permitted to, then traffic, parking, schools, parks and other government services would be overcrowded or overburdened. The government is also responding to NIMBY-ism where people do not want the additional tenants that basement units would bring to the neighborhood. I, personally, wish the process was easier because the increased housing supply might bring rents down a little.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2009, 12:30 PM
 
341 posts, read 452,646 times
Reputation: 113
Quote:
Originally Posted by gradstudent77 View Post
Beyond the safety issues, the city has an interest in controlling how many housing units it contains and where those units are. If everyone who could physically create an extra unit was actually permitted to, then traffic, parking, schools, parks and other government services would be overcrowded or overburdened. The government is also responding to NIMBY-ism where people do not want the additional tenants that basement units would bring to the neighborhood. I, personally, wish the process was easier because the increased housing supply might bring rents down a little.
That makes sense. But that's what NYC is like already lol. Ugh...sooooo overcrowded. If people can't rent basements..they just cram 3-4 of them into a one bedroom anyway.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2009, 12:52 PM
 
1 posts, read 6,649 times
Reputation: 10
Has a landlord ever been able to win by staying that you, "You rented a studio w/ a recreation room, not a one-bedroom"??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2010, 08:05 AM
 
1 posts, read 6,386 times
Reputation: 14
Can the department of buildings evict you with no notice if you didn't know your apartment was illegal. I pay my own electric, phone, cable etc...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2010, 09:51 AM
 
Location: Out of this world
278 posts, read 1,520,187 times
Reputation: 169
Quote:
Originally Posted by Platinum333 View Post
I know but I mean, the doors are the only way to get out in a lot of houses. I understand the public saftey perspective..but I don't agree with the city. I think people are able to make their own decisions for themsleves and it's fine if it doesn't hurt anyone else..


Btw..I still don't know if my apt. is illegal then? From what I read...it isn't...*sigh* who knows?

Platinum333

Personally I believe the illegal basement apartments are exaggerated. As for the illegal cellar apartments, they may be dangerous.

Most of the basement apartments I've seen have two means of egress, yet they are considered illegal because the landlord didn't have a CofO. Which boils down to the city wants to know how much rent your collecting so you can pay the proper taxes. The more taxes you pay, the better the city does. Not to mention it cost thousands of dollars to convert a basement apartment. In which case everybody makes money except the landlord.

And don't think the landlord makes money once the legal basement apartment is rented. Because that takes years to recoup. Not to mention the landlord had better hope he/she finds a tenant that pays on time and not one who plays the system.

I understand that most landlords are in bad financial situations and need to rent the basement to make ends meet. Almost all of them can't afford to convert to legal apartments. Now I'm not saying this is ok, I'm just saying I could see why it is done.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2010, 11:31 AM
 
2,718 posts, read 5,359,544 times
Reputation: 6257
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dbatiste View Post
Most of the basement apartments I've seen have two means of egress, yet they are considered illegal because the landlord didn't have a CofO. Which boils down to the city wants to know how much rent your collecting so you can pay the proper taxes.
Well. Yeah. That's how the world works. You earn income, you pay taxes on that income.

Further, just because a basement apartment has two means of egress does not mean it's necessarily safe for someone to live there.

Quote:
And don't think the landlord makes money once the legal basement apartment is rented. Because that takes years to recoup. Not to mention the landlord had better hope he/she finds a tenant that pays on time and not one who plays the system.
Isn't renting out an illegal apartment and not reporting taxable income "play[ing] the system" as well?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2010, 11:45 AM
 
Location: Out of this world
278 posts, read 1,520,187 times
Reputation: 169
Cleasach

I was unclear. When I said "the city wants to know how much rent your collecting" I meant that it is a way for the city to raise your property taxes. Not income taxes. I would hope or assume that landlords are reporting their true income taxes, which is their responsibility.

As for the basement apartment. Like I said, "the ones that I have seen", had all of the required things to occupy it. They just didn't have the CofO. No violations were written as to them being a saftey hazard. Now with that said, I don't know what you have seen and therefore cannot judge.

Lastly, I said "And don't think the landlord makes money once the Legal basement apartment is rented". However, I could see how you could have mis-read the word.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2010, 11:54 AM
 
34,097 posts, read 47,302,110 times
Reputation: 14273
Quote:
Originally Posted by lisaa3m View Post
Can the department of buildings evict you with no notice if you didn't know your apartment was illegal. I pay my own electric, phone, cable etc...
yes they can evict you
__________________
"The man who sleeps on the floor, can never fall out of bed." -Martin Lawrence

Forum TOS: https://www.city-data.com/forumtos.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:



Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > New York City
Similar Threads
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top