Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > New York City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-09-2011, 11:17 AM
 
6,940 posts, read 9,691,324 times
Reputation: 3153

Advertisements

Is it a good idea? Would it make things better?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-09-2011, 11:48 AM
 
Location: New York City
4,035 posts, read 10,304,623 times
Reputation: 3753
Not really. Light rail is usually partially “at grade” so it would merely slow existing traffic. It also has a much lower capacity, which would be used up before it’s completed, at least in the dense parts of the city. They use it in Jersey, but it’s to get people to newly developed areas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2011, 12:12 PM
 
8,743 posts, read 18,389,726 times
Reputation: 4168
I would have much prefered light rail along 2nd ave than the gigantic 2nd ave train they are building. It would have been incredibly less time, phenomenally less money, easier access for people, and reduced car traffic along the street.

Ideally I would prefer street cars all over the city....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2011, 01:00 PM
 
108 posts, read 286,108 times
Reputation: 65
We DID have a light rail system - they were called trolleys. They were replaced by bus routes. Bringing the system back would, I assume, replace the buses. Outside of the presumed benefit of lowered exhaust emissions, I can't off the top of my head come up with any additional benefits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2011, 01:07 PM
 
6,940 posts, read 9,691,324 times
Reputation: 3153
Quote:
Originally Posted by grvthang View Post
We DID have a light rail system - they were called trolleys. They were replaced by bus routes. Bringing the system back would, I assume, replace the buses. Outside of the presumed benefit of lowered exhaust emissions, I can't off the top of my head come up with any additional benefits.
Yeah, I like looking at old footage of trolleys.

I think light rail would do good in NYC. It works in SF and Philly. Why not NYC?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2011, 01:17 PM
 
12,766 posts, read 18,402,231 times
Reputation: 8773
Quote:
Originally Posted by knowledgeiskey View Post
Yeah, I like looking at old footage of trolleys.

I think light rail would do good in NYC. It works in SF and Philly. Why not NYC?
Philly is a way smaller city than NYC. I think NYC is too congested for something like that now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2011, 01:34 PM
 
Location: On the Rails in Northern NJ
12,380 posts, read 26,880,245 times
Reputation: 4582
It would only work on SI were the population isn't that built up.....and maybe the out boroughs....also LI. My state plans on constructing another 160 miles of Electric light rail lines over the next decade and over 250 miles of Diesel light rail in the south Jersey.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2011, 01:56 PM
 
5,000 posts, read 8,222,483 times
Reputation: 4574
They're talking about bringing a trolley back to run on the old tracks between downtown Brooklyn and Red Hook. I would be all for it, except for one thing. I know for a fact that in a 10 years max the areas along the line will be full of pretentious, snotty douchenuggets who have decided that all of their boutiques and over priced cafe's are better than anything that Brooklyn has ever known. And that sickens me...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2011, 02:34 PM
 
8,743 posts, read 18,389,726 times
Reputation: 4168
simmer down available....one thing I have learned about NYC...you never know what will happen in 10 years...I have been wrong almost every time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2011, 02:45 PM
 
86 posts, read 307,040 times
Reputation: 119
Light rail would work only on Staten Island, and eastern Queens. The areas beyond that are too dense for light rail, and would most likely interrupt car traffic. Light rail could easily cross the Verrazano Narrows Bridge. Robert Moses designed the bridge with a 5% grade too steep for a subway train, but not really steep for a light rail car.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:



Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > New York City
Similar Threads
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top