Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Anything over either 500 or 7500 cc is going to jump up the insurance, but not terrible.
I opted for Buell Blast over the Ninja 250. Not much more HP, but way more torque. Still, a very small bike. On top of the SV 650, a great option, the GS500 is another good low cost, and more comfortable bike. If you can find it, a new Seca II 750 could be alright
Yeah the GS500 is a great bike also. It was my first bike and I rode it for 2 years before upgrading. Plus, if you get one used for around $2k, you can pretty much sell it for what you paid for it.
SV650. Perfect blend of power and performance (touring/acceleration). Anything bigger than that will be too big of a jump.
I hear people say this all the time, but I don't always agree. My first bike was a 2001 GSX-R 750 (new). I never went crazy, and never felt it was too much. Just used common sense when twisting my right hand. Physically, the bike was just the right size for me. I think it really depends on the individual.
Price wise however, smaller bikes tend to be cheaper. Get into the 750+ zone, and things get pricey to purchase and insure.
As you can see the 500cc to 750cc range is the sweet spot for everyday use without being a land yacht bike.
Fwiw, you can get bigger engine bikes that are just as agile as mid-engine bikes, but once you get over 1000cc, you start to get into pure cruiser territory.
Fwiw, you can get bigger engine bikes that are just as agile as mid-engine bikes, but once you get over 1000cc, you start to get into pure cruiser territory.
I said that you start to get into cruiser territory, not that its exclusively cruiser territory. Sorry you didn't understand - I'm sure we both agree that there are very agile big-engine bikes out there.
I said that you start to get into cruiser territory, not that its exclusively cruiser territory. Sorry you didn't understand - I'm sure we both agree that there are very agile big-engine bikes out there.
All very true. However, let's not forget insurance penalty/fuel MPG penalty that anything over 750cc imposes. That is what I meant by "sweet spot" and still
carry two people at a safe speed on the highway. Anything larger just isn't a practical everyday "utility" bike at legal speeds.
I rode a 750cc BMW for 15 years everyday the weather permitted until I had to quit because of arthritis in my legs. Miss that bike I do.
Yes, insurance is definitely higher on the big-engine bikes. Fwiw, my 920cc "commuter" motorcycle gets 45 mpg in spirited riding, so its not close to a 250's higher mpg, but the trade off is power and for me, versatility - I'd never try to take a 250 onto the highway. This is why I ride naked, or standard, motorcycles though - you get a good balance of sport, comfort, mpg, and lower insurance rates.
Net net, any mid-size bike (500-750) is perfectly fine for all riding imo. I originally just wanted to point out that just because its a liter bike doesn't mean its a barge.
i'd second the idea of a Nighthawk provided it's your style. it's not hellaciously more balsy than what you are used to, but it has good power, great ergos, and a great track record for reliability. you can probably find one in decent shape for your price range.
the SV is another great idea, but any that you can find for $2K are likely pretty beat. even the first gen models in decent shape USUALLY run at least $500 more than that. of course, your experience may vary.
Mike
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.