Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Mortgages
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-31-2008, 11:22 AM
 
165 posts, read 1,025,513 times
Reputation: 105

Advertisements

Hi, I'm curious about the pros and cons of a FHA loan. I received a bunch of quotes and many of them were FHA - possibly this is because I want to leave my money in savings and not put as much down, and also my credit scores are only about 650. One broker (loan officer? I don't know her official title) said she doesn't do FHA loans - why not? Are they harder to qualify for? Does the broker not receive as much in fees?

Thanks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-31-2008, 01:14 PM
 
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina
5,137 posts, read 16,595,638 times
Reputation: 1009
They need to be HUD approved, and HUD doesnt give their licenses w/out the lender passing HUD requirements.

HUD is now not offering too many licenses, and have become a lot stricter than before.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2008, 02:34 PM
 
Location: MID ATLANTIC
8,676 posts, read 22,938,531 times
Reputation: 10517
FHA loans are the most competitive loans available with minimal down payment.

Requirements to become approved to originate, or originate and close, or originate, approve and close, all vary. It appears that lender cannot meet the minimum requirements to originate FHA loans. (usually asset requirements).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2008, 07:05 AM
 
Location: Washington D.C. (Metro)
76 posts, read 188,794 times
Reputation: 31
Some Mortgage companies are actually not registered with their state to do FHA loans. I worked at a company where they did not offer it and while I still was able to bring in business, I was missing that extra tool of FHA.

We have since been approved for FHA and I'd say over 70% of the loans I do for my clients are FHA based. One of the main reasons I use FHA for my clients is because if they are doing a re-finance on their home, they can pull out up to 95% of the homes value versus the standard 90% and even 85% in some cases with conventional financing.

The only con to FHA loans really is that you will have private mortgage insurance on the loan and have to pay an up front Mortgage Insurance Premium which in most cases is 1.5% of the total loan amount. Now, this fee can and most always is rolled into the financing so that you don't actually have to bring that to closing but that is basically the only con of FHA. I think that the pro's certainly outweigh the con's especially if you are in need of cash or a lower interest rate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2008, 11:23 AM
 
Location: Laguna Niguel, CA
768 posts, read 4,344,228 times
Reputation: 457
It's unfortunate that FHA is likely going to reduce cash out to 85% LTV soon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2008, 01:38 PM
 
5,342 posts, read 14,150,412 times
Reputation: 4700
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShanetheMortgageMan View Post
It's unfortunate that FHA is likely going to reduce cash out to 85% LTV soon.
More like, it is a good idea.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2008, 01:39 PM
 
5,342 posts, read 14,150,412 times
Reputation: 4700
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShanetheMortgageMan View Post
It's unfortunate that FHA is likely going to reduce cash out to 85% LTV soon.

and what's with the name? I was originally Timthemortgageguy, but the mods hammered me with name infractions and red marks. It was like I broke the law. Hence, the goofy Timtheguy moniker.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2008, 02:24 PM
 
Location: Laguna Niguel, CA
768 posts, read 4,344,228 times
Reputation: 457
I don't think it's a bad idea, but it does stink as I've done my fair share of 95% cash out's with FHA.

Not sure why I haven't been asked to change it, I did read the guidelines but it just said to not make mention of an email address, company name, etc. If they do I don't mind though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2008, 05:52 AM
 
Location: Plano, Texas
1,673 posts, read 7,021,689 times
Reputation: 698
To the original poster, my rule concerning FHA is if your credit score is under 680 you should use FHA financing, but if credit scores are higher it is better to go conventional financing. The reason i use this rule is if your score is above a 680, conventional financing will get you the same rate as FHA but FHA is more expensive due to an upfront fee of 1.75% of the loan amount.

To the other mortgage guys, i feel you about FHA cutting the cashout but in Texas where i do loans, we have never been able to do a FHA cashout and conventional financing is limited to 80% of the appraised value.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2008, 11:25 PM
 
Location: Denver
3,380 posts, read 9,216,976 times
Reputation: 3432
Quote:
Originally Posted by VictorBurek View Post
To the original poster, my rule concerning FHA is if your credit score is under 680 you should use FHA financing, but if credit scores are higher it is better to go conventional financing. The reason i use this rule is if your score is above a 680, conventional financing will get you the same rate as FHA but FHA is more expensive due to an upfront fee of 1.75% of the loan amount.

To the other mortgage guys, i feel you about FHA cutting the cashout but in Texas where i do loans, we have never been able to do a FHA cashout and conventional financing is limited to 80% of the appraised value.
That might be true. But on the last GFE estimates I got (FHA/conventional) the FHA had lower monthly payments. Go figure. It was due to the pmi being so much less on the fha. Even with the 1.75 financed into the mortgage. I have 790+ and am thinking FHA because of the lower downpayment. I have the money for a higher downpayment. But I don't want to bury my savings into the house. I would rather have it liquid for emergencies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Mortgages

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top