Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Michigan
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-23-2007, 06:34 AM
 
2 posts, read 28,337 times
Reputation: 14

Advertisements

In my cad class we are designing houses. We have got them all done and now we can’t decide if it is cheaper to build a house with 1 floor and 3000 sq. ft. or a 2 story house with 1500 sq.ft. on each floor. The total living space would still be the same.we need some more info

Last edited by youngcaduser; 02-23-2007 at 06:36 AM.. Reason: add more
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-23-2007, 07:50 AM
 
25 posts, read 186,866 times
Reputation: 17
Its always cheaper to build a two story house than a ranch. A 3000 sq ft ranch would have a very large basement which is expensive and a much larger roof area. Take the same size two story and the basement is only 1500 sq ft not 3000 sq ft, also the roof on the second floor is much smaller. So there is less in the way of roof trusses, plywood, insulation and shingles. Otherwise everything inside is the same cost. Hope this helps you out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2007, 11:38 AM
 
2 posts, read 28,337 times
Reputation: 14
thanks, that helped me alot.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2007, 11:51 AM
 
111 posts, read 485,455 times
Reputation: 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by youngcaduser View Post
In my cad class we are designing houses. We have got them all done and now we can’t decide if it is cheaper to build a house with 1 floor and 3000 sq. ft. or a 2 story house with 1500 sq.ft. on each floor. The total living space would still be the same.we need some more info
Always cheaper to build up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2007, 02:30 PM
 
Location: Chicago
38,707 posts, read 103,243,287 times
Reputation: 29983
Quote:
Originally Posted by TurboState View Post
Always cheaper to build up.
Kind of depends on how far up, doesn't it? Since gravity is an accelerative force, the amount of energy required to build upward grows exponentially. Cheaper to build up for a two-story house? Probably. Cheaper to build up when you need 50,000 square feet? Probably not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Michigan

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top