Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Michigan
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-03-2007, 03:36 PM
 
271 posts, read 934,452 times
Reputation: 151

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by suydam View Post
Meanwhile, water levels fall, ports need dredging and nobody knows why.....



So what does the Nestle water label say, "Fortified with e-coli, mercury, PCBs, and vitamins!"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-03-2007, 03:43 PM
 
271 posts, read 934,452 times
Reputation: 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by Driller1 View Post
Irrigation wells pump more, they benefit the farmer to sell his crops for profit. How do you feel about that?
Farmers, according to the USDA, use 70% of all fresh water in America. Corporations use close to 20%. Residents use virtually none as compared to those profiting from the use of fresh water...

At some point, the EPA will be forced to pass laws that require farmers to use more retention ponds instead of fresh groundwater. Not until the H20 shortages get much worse though over more states. Global warming could easily expedite this occurance....TBD

Now the good news is I'm developing a device so Michiganders can filter and drink their own urine once farmers and coporations drain the natural supplies. I'm still working on a name...either "I can't Believe its Water" or "Pee-licious"...what do you think???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-03-2007, 03:51 PM
 
24,832 posts, read 37,356,060 times
Reputation: 11539
Cities dump tons of raw sewage, do not forget to pitchfork them too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-03-2007, 03:55 PM
 
24,832 posts, read 37,356,060 times
Reputation: 11539
Quote:
Originally Posted by Siberia View Post
Farmers, according to the USDA, use 70% of all fresh water in America. Corporations use close to 20%. Residents use virtually none as compared to those profiting from the use of fresh water...

At some point, the EPA will be forced to pass laws that require farmers to use more retention ponds instead of fresh groundwater. Not until the H20 shortages get much worse though over more states. Global warming could easily expedite this occurance....TBD

Now the good news is I'm developing a device so Michiganders can filter and drink their own urine once farmers and coporations drain the natural supplies. I'm still working on a name...either "I can't Believe its Water" or "Pee-licious"...what do you think???
No need, healthy urine is germ free. Our bodies do a great job. Keep your thinking cap on......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-03-2007, 04:02 PM
 
24,832 posts, read 37,356,060 times
Reputation: 11539
Quote:
Originally Posted by Siberia View Post


So what does the Nestle water label say, "Fortified with e-coil, mercury, PCBs, and vitamins!"
We have tested it. No e-coil or fecal coliform. Never ran a partial-cem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2007, 11:56 AM
 
Location: East Grand Rapids, MI
845 posts, read 3,272,621 times
Reputation: 241
Quote:
Originally Posted by Driller1 View Post
I am saying they are within the rules. Who owns the groundwater? They are creating jobs, which we need. The aquifer flows into the lakes, not from them. That is why one of some of the hardest areas to drill is close to a river or lake. Odd, but true.
The aquifer flowing into the big lake is why so many people are against the drilling and bottling of Michigan's groundwater.

Those aquifers are one of the major sources of water to replenish the lakes.....if they get mined and packaged, they don't flow into Lake Michigan/Huron/Georgian Bay and when that happens water levels keep dropping.

As for why people aren't out arguing for less pollution in the lakes, they are and progress is being made. The lakes are infinitely cleaner today than they were 30 years ago..

The reason the bottled water isn't polluted like the lakes (to answer another question posed above) is that the bottled water comes from the aquifers that fill the lakes...not the lakes themselves.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2007, 01:19 PM
 
24,832 posts, read 37,356,060 times
Reputation: 11539
Changes would have to come from the legilature. They are within the rules.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2007, 02:50 PM
 
Location: Metro Detroit, MI
3,490 posts, read 3,201,545 times
Reputation: 466
Well the fact remains that the Lakes are at an all time low yet Nestle gets to suck 'em drier. I think it's sad and someday, I think we will all pay for it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2007, 03:24 PM
 
2 posts, read 5,203 times
Reputation: 10
Pumping water for bottled water wont put a dent in the lakes. The lakes have more to loose from global warmng that many people try to deny, then from a bit of swiss bottling.
It is more that people do not want forign interest to make a $ off of us than any damage it could do.
I am sure there was an impact study done for the government.
Maybe it will even bring in a couple of jobs for mi. but it will have the same inpact on the job market as the water table, not much. They would have to supply 100000 jobs to even start to make a dent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2007, 03:33 PM
 
Location: Metro Detroit, MI
3,490 posts, read 3,201,545 times
Reputation: 466
Quote:
Originally Posted by vonloan View Post
Pumping water for bottled water wont put a dent in the lakes. The lakes have more to loose from global warmng that many people try to deny, then from a bit of swiss bottling.
It is more that people do not want forign interest to make a $ off of us than any damage it could do.
I am sure there was an impact study done for the government.
Maybe it will even bring in a couple of jobs for mi. but it will have the same inpact on the job market as the water table, not much. They would have to supply 100000 jobs to even start to make a dent.
Oh yes, and our government has been so honest and evenhanded in all it's dealings.

So because the Lakes are ALREADY LOSING WATER due to global warming, it's okay for Nestle to jump in and make it worse? Ugh.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Michigan

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top