Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Maine
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-09-2011, 11:02 PM
 
Location: MidCoast Maine
476 posts, read 748,419 times
Reputation: 312

Advertisements

You haven't really experienced remote until you've parked in the Toy Story parking lot at Disneyland.
Trudging back to your car parked miles away, at 1:30 in the morning, after blitzing through the park for 16 hours… now that's REMOTE!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-10-2011, 02:01 AM
 
19,969 posts, read 30,232,757 times
Reputation: 40042
Maine is over 90% trees, the MOST forested state in the country

The forests of Maine stretch from Kittery to Fort Kent and from Jackman to Lubec. In fact, forests cover 90% (17.7 million acres) of the state, making Maine the most heavily forested state in the country.
Northern and eastern Maine have the largest tracts of undeveloped forest in the eastern United States. In the western United States, large blocks of forest are publicly owned and overseen by the federal government. Maine is unique in that the public owns just 6% of forest in the state. The other 94% (16.7 million acres) is in private hands.

The 10 million acres known as the North Woods (dark green on map) is the largest unfragmented forest east of the Mississippi River map won't come up, but it's a map of just maine, shaded from west to north to east
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2011, 05:57 AM
 
Location: Northern Maine
10,428 posts, read 18,689,543 times
Reputation: 11563
Here is a link to "Keeping Maine's Forests". It is a Maine State initiative to prevent those who own wooded land in Maine from living on it. A century and a half ago, Henry David Thoreau asked, "Why would anybody go west when Maine has everything?" Today the answer is LURC, The Land Use Regulation Commission. It's a misnomer. What they really regulate with a heavy fist is people.

Click on the link. It is very slick and it hides the true intent of all this which is rural cleansing. Over the past few weeks there have been numerous posts related to Northern Maine. The three maps on Page 11 of this document are very useful.

http://www.keepingmainesforests.org/...%2013%2010.pdf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2011, 06:29 AM
 
Location: Forests of Maine
37,470 posts, read 61,415,702 times
Reputation: 30424
There are a lot of people who do not want to allow anyone to live in the UTs of Maine.

I have met a few of them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2011, 02:10 PM
 
Location: Indiana Uplands
26,428 posts, read 46,599,435 times
Reputation: 19574
The lowest population density of any county in the eastern US is Hamilton County, NY at 2.9 people per square mile, in the Adirondack park.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2011, 02:21 PM
 
Location: Forests of Maine
37,470 posts, read 61,415,702 times
Reputation: 30424
The US census Bureau produces a population density map of Maine that shows the relative population densities of different areas, broken down by people per square mile.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...lation_map.png

As you can see vast regions of Maine have less than 1 person per square mile.

Here is yet another census map which shows the huge areas of Maine with less than 1 person per square mile.

http://www.statemapsonline.com/image...ensity-Map.jpg





I recall reading an article during the most recent census, about how the US Census had to combine so many townships into clusters so they could find one person to survey.

There were dozens of town-clusters like that. This 4 town-cluster, that 3 town-cluster, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2011, 02:44 PM
 
Location: West Michigan
12,083 posts, read 38,863,158 times
Reputation: 17006
Quote:
Originally Posted by GraniteStater View Post
The lowest population density of any county in the eastern US is Hamilton County, NY at 2.9 people per square mile, in the Adirondack park.
You can't go by population density along at the County level when determining how remote an area is. Hamilton County is 1717 square miles in size which is SMALL compared to the Counties in Northern Maine. Aroostook is 6671 square miles, Piscataquis is 3960 sq/mi and Somerset County is 3924 sq/mi. Either Somerset or Piscataquis has an area that is under 1 person per square miles that would be at least 1 1/2 times as large as Hamilton County. Western Aroostook County would have an area that would easily be less than 3 people per square miles that is 2 1/2 times as large.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2011, 07:48 PM
 
Location: Indiana Uplands
26,428 posts, read 46,599,435 times
Reputation: 19574
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bydand View Post
You can't go by population density along at the County level when determining how remote an area is. Hamilton County is 1717 square miles in size which is SMALL compared to the Counties in Northern Maine. Aroostook is 6671 square miles, Piscataquis is 3960 sq/mi and Somerset County is 3924 sq/mi. Either Somerset or Piscataquis has an area that is under 1 person per square miles that would be at least 1 1/2 times as large as Hamilton County. Western Aroostook County would have an area that would easily be less than 3 people per square miles that is 2 1/2 times as large.
On a township or UT basis that would be correct for the remote portions of the Maine counties. In terms of the county with the lowest overall density in Maine- it would be Piscataquis. However, Aroostook probably has a larger UT land area.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-12-2011, 07:56 PM
 
Location: West Michigan
12,083 posts, read 38,863,158 times
Reputation: 17006
Quote:
Originally Posted by GraniteStater View Post
On a township or UT basis that would be correct for the remote portions of the Maine counties. In terms of the county with the lowest overall density in Maine- it would be Piscataquis. However, Aroostook probably has a larger UT land area.
That's what I meant. County, by County density comparisons don't tell the whole story when it comes to counties that are that large and forested.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2011, 10:07 PM
 
13 posts, read 15,457 times
Reputation: 23
Quote:
Originally Posted by maineguy8888 View Post
As far as just pure remoteness, I don't think there are any areas in the entire lower 48 that are more remote than northern Maine. All the previous contenders have seen quite a bit of change over the last 50 years. Or they are located on the way to "somewhere else". But we're still our own little world lol
I like it........it keeps the crazies and wimps out lol
I would classify most Mainers as crazy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Maine

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top