Quote:
Originally Posted by S.I.B.
I didn't try to. go back and read YOUR post and then MY response and try to figure it out. If you can't, go away.
|
The content of my post to which you responded and quoted was:
"but one must weigh the potential harms of calling on an innocent person who broke no law based on your intuition and personal disciplining preferences against the supposed benefit of the call."
This was specifically in reference to Amity's situation. As such, your response was a non sequitur because you admit it had nothing to do with the discussion. You had chosen to go meta without telling anyone and I was supposed to divine this.
My bad?
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
