Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Nevada > Las Vegas
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-03-2010, 04:46 PM
 
1,030 posts, read 1,592,882 times
Reputation: 1214

Advertisements

Recently I inquired about any new programs for financing regarding my existing home loan in Vegas. We bought about a year and a half ago. My loan officer said that even though we declined the PMI private mortgage at the time of our loan, the bank bought it behind our backs (and paid for it themselves) and never told us. I only found out when asking now about any re fi options.

Because of this I was ineligible to take advantage of some of the Government refinance programs due to the Bank purchasing PMI.

Would a Bank be more generous in accepting a short sale situation knowing that they would get the difference back via PMI or would it not matter?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-03-2010, 05:07 PM
 
Location: central, between Pepe's Tacos and Roberto's
2,086 posts, read 6,853,350 times
Reputation: 958
Quote:
Originally Posted by Packrat1 View Post
Recently I inquired about any new programs for financing regarding my existing home loan in Vegas. We bought about a year and a half ago. My loan officer said that even though we declined the PMI private mortgage at the time of our loan, the bank bought it behind our backs (and paid for it themselves) and never told us. I only found out when asking now about any re fi options.

Because of this I was ineligible to take advantage of some of the Government refinance programs due to the Bank purchasing PMI.

Would a Bank be more generous in accepting a short sale situation knowing that they would get the difference back via PMI or would it not matter?
Something doesn't make sense here. It is not up to you to carry PMI or not. If the loan to value guidelines require it, it's required, period. You cannot choose to opt out. What may have happened is that your loan officer may have originated a loan with lender paid mortgage insurance (LPMI) and as such the rate and rebate or points would be different from base pricing. If this is the case, your LO had full knowledge of it as should you. Do you have your mortgage paperwork? Did you sign a PMI disclosure? All of your information should be in there, but I have honestly never heard of a bank attaching PMI behind a borrower's back, and to be honest I would think that it would be illegal (just speculation though as I am not really willing to look into the legalities of it).

That said, I would imagine that PMI would likely not make much of a difference to the lender at this point. Depending on how much value your home has lost, there is still the potential for the lender to be on the hook for a substantial amount even with PMI, which of course would not be good for there balance sheets.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2010, 06:08 PM
 
1,030 posts, read 1,592,882 times
Reputation: 1214
Checked my loan documents and we did not have to pay PMI. Our loan was a no fee no pmi loan. (of course there always are fees....) Perhaps the loan officer I spoke to recently meant the bank bought "LPMI" as opposed to PMI. Neverless, their purchasing LPMI or whatever it's called thwarted us from being eligible for one of the Federal programs. Apparently a loan with some sort of mortgage insurance doesn't qualify for Federal Mortgage Modification plans. Here is some of the language I found on the governmentrefinanceassistance.com website which stated in part. Quote; 2. A “Homeowner Affordability and Stability Plan/ Home Affordable Refinance” — With President Obama’s new plan qualified homeowners can refinance a conventional first mortgage for up to 105% of the current value of the home (soon to be 125%). However this program does not work well for people who have second mortgages, credit scores below 680, or who currently pay mortgage insurance (PMI).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2010, 06:42 AM
 
Location: North Las Vegas
1,631 posts, read 3,955,088 times
Reputation: 768
Quote:
Originally Posted by Packrat1 View Post
Checked my loan documents and we did not have to pay PMI. Our loan was a no fee no pmi loan. (of course there always are fees....) Perhaps the loan officer I spoke to recently meant the bank bought "LPMI" as opposed to PMI. Neverless, their purchasing LPMI or whatever it's called thwarted us from being eligible for one of the Federal programs. Apparently a loan with some sort of mortgage insurance doesn't qualify for Federal Mortgage Modification plans. Here is some of the language I found on the governmentrefinanceassistance.com website which stated in part. Quote; 2. A “Homeowner Affordability and Stability Plan/ Home Affordable Refinance” — With President Obama’s new plan qualified homeowners can refinance a conventional first mortgage for up to 105% of the current value of the home (soon to be 125%). However this program does not work well for people who have second mortgages, credit scores below 680, or who currently pay mortgage insurance (PMI).
What I have had lenders tell me that banks don't get paid on mortgage insurance when a property is a short sale, that it has to go into foreclosure before the insurance is paid. That is another reason why banks don't respond to short sales in a timely matter and why short sales usually end up foreclosed on. Only properties without PMI usually have a successful short sale. Most properties sold in the past wrote 1st and seconds to get around PMI , because a primary loan must be 80% to not have to have PMI.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Nevada > Las Vegas

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top