Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Missouri > Kansas City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-23-2010, 01:24 PM
 
Location: Clayton, MO
1,521 posts, read 3,598,365 times
Reputation: 441

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by kcmo View Post
I've been busy posting on other forums about this. This forum has such a suburban "soccermom" mentaility that it's far from the right place to discuss "urban" planning.
Yes, a very different feel than the StL board.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-24-2010, 08:31 PM
 
Location: Kansas City North
6,816 posts, read 11,542,919 times
Reputation: 17146
I had to laugh this morning when I read in the Star that now they are saying this isn't the final plan, that changes may be made.

Backtracking as good as any politician.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2010, 10:25 AM
 
Location: Washington, DC area
11,108 posts, read 23,886,188 times
Reputation: 6438
Anybody listen to that interview with the CEO of PS on KCUR?

It was interesting. Nearly all the calls were from KCMO and the MO side burbs (all positive). A couple from Mission Hills (positive) and one call from Overland Park recommending the company move to Corporate Woods (not so positive).

When asked if he would move the firm to Kansas, he stated that a good friend of his was presently moving his company from the a long time Plaza location to OP because Kansas gave him 3 million dollars. He couldn't pass it up. So sad.

He stated he does not want to move to Kansas, but stopped short of saying he would never move there. KS did offer pretty substantial incentives to their firm he said.

I hope he stays in KCMO, sounds like a good company that wants to make KC better, they just need to go back to the drawing board with their plans and Highwoods needs to go. They are the problem, not the law firm.

It's interesting how KC has stepped up to save the balcony building and tower on the plaza. Where was KC when the Law Building and TWA building were demolished in Downtown KC?

It would be nice if KC had a fraction of the passion they do for 47th and Broadway that they could apply around other parts of the city, especially the CEO's of companies that continue to play KS against KCMO which creates only a loss loss situation for everybody...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2010, 12:31 PM
 
Location: Old Hyde Park, Kansas City,MO
1,145 posts, read 2,464,399 times
Reputation: 593
I was at Town Center last night to watch a movie and noticed this new project called park place or something. This project just sickened me. It looks excatly the same as all these same type of projects in Dallas, Houston and other sun belt/lots of land type cities
You could basically say OP/Olathe Lenexa is turning into a Sun Belt City while the Urban Core is representing Upper Midwest towns

I have a feeling Karma will come back on the Kansas burbs, i don't know how, but i just have a feeling, it may not be in my generation but i have a feeling something will happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2010, 02:40 PM
 
Location: Tower Grove East, St. Louis, MO
12,063 posts, read 31,621,105 times
Reputation: 3799
I agree that the new parts of JoCo are very sun belt-y. Before I had seen much of KC I thought it was all like that based on my early experiences.

Whether or not there's some sort of karmic retribution coming to them is something I can't surmise, but it seems that the big draw for the sun belt is how new and shiny everything is. I've always wondered what happens when that is no longer the case.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2010, 04:25 PM
 
1,662 posts, read 4,503,347 times
Reputation: 539
Quote:
Originally Posted by aragx6 View Post
I agree that the new parts of JoCo are very sun belt-y. Before I had seen much of KC I thought it was all like that based on my early experiences.

Whether or not there's some sort of karmic retribution coming to them is something I can't surmise, but it seems that the big draw for the sun belt is how new and shiny everything is. I've always wondered what happens when that is no longer the case.
Well, if it's an area that is still popular and it's cost effective to do so, they keep it looking new and shiny. <shrug>

Talk of karmic retribution is kind of amusing. Who knows what will happen? No one can say. Which is why city leaders and planners have to jump on and move with what's hot now in residential and commercial ventures. Trends come and go, business (and city government is a business and should be run like one) just tries to keep up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-25-2010, 06:16 PM
 
Location: Indiana Uplands
26,407 posts, read 46,575,260 times
Reputation: 19544
Quote:
Originally Posted by brewcrew1000 View Post
I was at Town Center last night to watch a movie and noticed this new project called park place or something. This project just sickened me. It looks excatly the same as all these same type of projects in Dallas, Houston and other sun belt/lots of land type cities
You could basically say OP/Olathe Lenexa is turning into a Sun Belt City while the Urban Core is representing Upper Midwest towns

I have a feeling Karma will come back on the Kansas burbs, i don't know how, but i just have a feeling, it may not be in my generation but i have a feeling something will happen.
I have been saying this for years. The outer suburban and exurban parts of JOCO are extremely Sunbelt-like for whatever reason. It really feels absolutely nothing like most of the Midwest at all. To compare south Leawood to old Leawood might as well entail traveling into completely separate worlds. It is just insane.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2010, 06:19 AM
 
1,662 posts, read 4,503,347 times
Reputation: 539
Quote:
Originally Posted by GraniteStater View Post
I have been saying this for years. The outer suburban and exurban parts of JOCO are extremely Sunbelt-like for whatever reason. It really feels absolutely nothing like most of the Midwest at all. To compare south Leawood to old Leawood might as well entail traveling into completely separate worlds. It is just insane.


Are you talking about the styles and designs of neighborhoods and houses?

Because I don't see them looking much different from newer (and wealthy) suburban areas of other Midwest cities. JoCo has grown pretty wide pretty fast and so maybe it's more noticeable when people return who don't live here.

And yes, it's different from the older parts. But it's not "insane" that suburban building trends that began in CA and have been popular have made their way to other 'burbs. Trends are trends, that's what they do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2010, 07:06 AM
 
Location: Washington, DC area
11,108 posts, read 23,886,188 times
Reputation: 6438
For me, the "sunbelt" feel is not just the new construction, but also the spread out feel of the area. The super wide arterial streets (so many six-eight lane streets with dual right and left turn lanes making crossing the streets on foot insanely uncomfortable.

All the buildings have massive setbacks, the relative lack of trees, hills and the flat and straight streets and general topography.

Also, the office parks in their islands of surface parking lots on the vast prairies of KS.

JoCo looks pretty much just like suburban Phoenix without the palm trees. It looks nothing like suburban St Louis or Minneapolis or Denver or Chicago or even the suburbs on the Missouri side of KC.

It has more of a Phoenix, or Plano or suburban Oklahoma City feel to it. It's not like sunbelt places like Atlanta or LA though. The topography and street layout is too different.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2010, 07:17 AM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,930,375 times
Reputation: 12828
Quote:
Originally Posted by kcmo View Post
I've been busy posting on other forums about this. This forum has such a suburban "soccermom" mentaility that it's far from the right place to discuss "urban" planning.

But this is a terrible and destructive plan. The city can't let this happen in its current form.
When it is evident that the previous posters all feel that this building as designed is a huge mistake why do you find it necessary to be insulting and label the mentality as "soccer-mom"?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Missouri > Kansas City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top