Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology > Internet
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-21-2008, 12:07 PM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 87,031,688 times
Reputation: 36644

Advertisements

My speed test download speeds are fine in the middle of the day, but drop way down at night. I'm paying for 8,000 Kb/s high speed, and sometimes in the middle of the day, that's what I get. But then it starts dropping, and by 8 pm (and on weekends) it is often down to about 400 Kb/s. (Upload speed remains normal.) Too slow to even watch YouTube videos. My cable company tells me that they are reading correct values from their end. The repair man has been here three times, and cannot detect any problems, even switching out my modem and replacing wiring connectors. Ive increased my RAM, but that has had no effect. I've reset my computer clock for the wrong time, to ensure that I do not have a virus that is telling my computer to obstruct download speeds at certain times of the day. Still no change. My cable company refuses to acknowledge that there is anything on their end that they can find, and blame it on my computer. But my conputer has no way of knowing that it is REALLY 8-pm. I suspect that my cable company cannot handle it when they try to water too many lawns from the same hose, and all the kids are simultaneously downloading terabytes of music to their iPods. But they refuse to acknowledge that that could be the case. Any suggestions?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-21-2008, 12:14 PM
 
28,803 posts, read 47,723,889 times
Reputation: 37906
Yeah, the hose is too small and they're too lazy or cheap to turn the spigot.

I'd drop the fast speed. No reason to pay for the luxury if you're not getting it.

It is likely that your contract states "up to" 8,000 Kb/s.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2008, 12:47 PM
 
23,607 posts, read 70,467,118 times
Reputation: 49307
Classic case of overloading the line. All you can do is document and complain. I hate cable companies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2008, 01:00 PM
 
Location: Tyler, TX
23,861 posts, read 24,129,287 times
Reputation: 15136
While cable companies ALWAYS oversubscribe their networks (just as web hosts, voip phone providers - everyone - does), you can't rely on any Internet "speed test" sites to be accurate, unless it's run by your ISP, and even then there are things that could skew the results.

Using the "hose" analogy, the Internet is a network of hoses and valves, all owned and operated by different companies. There could be a "valve" in between you and the speed test site that's owned by some 3rd party and is the source of the bottleneck and your apparent lack of speed.

The ISP can only guarantee (and I doubt they actually "guarantee" anything) the bandwidth from your modem to the edge of their network. Anything beyond that is outside of their control.

That said, I agree that the most likely cause is the oversubscription of their network.

As someone mentioned, drop your plan to a cheaper one if you're not satisfied with the performance of your connection. The cable company has already done everything they can (replaced modem etc) short of upgrading their infrastructure (which they aren't going to do just for you ), and residential agreements never come with a service level agreement, so you're pretty well "hosed" when it comes to getting all the bandwidth you're paying for.

GL
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2008, 01:31 PM
 
312 posts, read 861,253 times
Reputation: 131
im using a wireless adaptor downstairs fron qwest on a dell vostro
shows
speed 11.0m.o mbps and on the dround 34.0 mbps
what is going on with the signal?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2008, 01:44 PM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 87,031,688 times
Reputation: 36644
Quote:
Originally Posted by swagger View Post

There could be a "valve" in between you and the speed test site that's owned by some 3rd party and is the source of the bottleneck and your apparent lack of speed.
GL
Whatever the "valve" is, it is also impeding all downloads in general. When my speed-test site indicates less than about 1,000 Kb/s, I can't watch YouTube videos because they do not download fast enough to keep ahead of the play, and they keep jerking to a stop. So is is more than an "apparent" lack of speed. Stuff doesn't download, which is my "apparent" lack of speed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2008, 02:30 PM
 
Location: Tyler, TX
23,861 posts, read 24,129,287 times
Reputation: 15136
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtur88 View Post
Whatever the "valve" is, it is also impeding all downloads in general. When my speed-test site indicates less than about 1,000 Kb/s, I can't watch YouTube videos because they do not download fast enough to keep ahead of the play, and they keep jerking to a stop. So is is more than an "apparent" lack of speed. Stuff doesn't download, which is my "apparent" lack of speed.
The "valve" in my analogy could be a peering point, a specific router, your modem or even your PC. There are lots of "hops" that a packet traverses when going from point A to point B on the Internet, and the "valve(s)" causing your problem could be anywhere along that path.

I think you missed my point, though. I wasn't saying that you're not getting the data quickly - I was just saying that it's possible that your ISP isn't to blame. I also said that it's likely that they are.

I know we disagree a lot in the politics forum, but I'm trying to help you here (as I have in the past).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2008, 08:57 PM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 87,031,688 times
Reputation: 36644
Quote:
Originally Posted by swagger View Post
The "valve" in my analogy could be a peering point, a specific router, your modem or even your PC. There are lots of "hops" that a packet traverses when going from point A to point B on the Internet, and the "valve(s)" causing your problem could be anywhere along that path.

I think you missed my point, though. I wasn't saying that you're not getting the data quickly - I was just saying that it's possible that your ISP isn't to blame. I also said that it's likely that they are.

I know we disagree a lot in the politics forum, but I'm trying to help you here (as I have in the past).
Thanks, I appreciate it. However, if the speeds are always high during midday hours and always very very low during night time hours, that would lead me to believe that it is obviously not sonthing within the confines of my own house. But rather, the problem is somewhere where the data transmission conditions vary predictably by time of day. Would you concur with that conclusion?

I don't have a router, it goes direct wall=>cable splitter=>modem=>PC. Wall hardware, modem and splitter have all been changed, to no effect. Everything before Wall is the bailiwick of the cable company. Giving credit where credit is due, it's SuddenLink. Geek Squad told me they are by far the best in town.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2008, 09:20 PM
 
Location: kcmo
712 posts, read 2,146,838 times
Reputation: 374
I've seen this same effect.. with my cable provider and even somewhat with my ADSL provider..

But that doesn't change the fact that bottlenecks betweens routers do happen to be sure of this you must test various points on the internet and or run traceroutes.. do the ms of your 1st and 2nd hop happen to be up higher during these peak times.. can you see a router overloaded by running a comparison of traceroutes between peak and non-peak times..

The bottom-line is if you can't convince the cable company to fix the problem.. your only other real world option is to seek another provider.. you should be happy to at least have cable as some people in this world and/or post on this forum deal with satellite.. a way worse denominator.. I think within only a short period of time (5 years maybe) we will see a wimax and possible LTE rollout provide a new availability of data everywhere.. (in major cities) There is one other way to fix it.. but since that doesn’t deal with real world norm.. I won’t mention it..

I would suggest you also consult your forum type at dslreports.com

A tool used to watch routers that is used by people like me who are into web servers.. is called "pingplotter" you can give that a try if you like..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2008, 12:32 PM
 
28,803 posts, read 47,723,889 times
Reputation: 37906
Ask your neighbors if they are seeing the same thing. If it's a generic (is that the right word?) problem then you know it's not "just you".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology > Internet
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top