Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The main thing about FF has bothered me were the add-ons that I would lose from time to time. I don't know if they have solved that.
It's not that you "lose them"
A new version of FF comes out and if the programmer who wrote the add-on/extension is still alive and interested they have to rewrite it to be compatible with the new FF version.
Have you ever noticed that with new versions of Windows you "lose" some programs? It's called "compatibility"
Location: Mableton, GA USA (NW Atlanta suburb, 4 miles OTP)
11,334 posts, read 26,086,242 times
Reputation: 3995
Quote:
Originally Posted by plwhit
It's not that you "lose them"
A new version of FF comes out and if the programmer who wrote the add-on/extension is still alive and interested they have to rewrite it to be compatible with the new FF version.
Have you ever noticed that with new versions of Windows you "lose" some programs? It's called "compatibility"
SameO-sameO....
With Windows, obsolescence is a marketing tool. With Firefox, it's the end result of a stupid decision on the part of the project maintainers. They've lost a lot of users because of it, and they're about to lose me because I'm getting sick of losing key add-ons during version upgrades that never seem to come back.
There's a reason mainframe OS makers make gradual functional changes. Fast changes can end up hurting or even destroying the third-party software ecosystem.
Then why would he put the link on CD? Some days...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.